'Patent Troll' Legislation Stalls, at Least for Now
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.22.14
Nearly six months after the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act (H.R. 3309), and three months after President Obama called on the U.S. Senate to "finish the job," Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) is taking the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act off the agenda for the Senate Judiciary Committee.
In removing the Senate bill targeting so-called "patent troll litigation," Sen. Leahy cited lack of sufficient support behind a comprehensive deal, blaming "competing companies on both sides of this issue" that "refused to come to agreement." Before taking the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act completely off the agenda, Sen. Leahy had delayed consideration of the bill numerous times in order to drum up bipartisan support. Sen. Leahy also repeated his earlier concerns that "the House-passed bill went beyond the scope of addressing patent trolls, and would have severe unintended consequences on legitimate patent holders who employ thousands of Americans." Sen. Leahy offered a chance that the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act would pass later this year, but only if "the stakeholders are able to reach a more targeted agreement that focuses on the problem of patent trolls."
With the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act out of the picture, at least for now, Congress is likely to turn its attention to other bills previously introduced in the House and Senate directed toward demand letters. Demand letters are thought to be one of the ways that at least some non-practicing entities (derisively called "patent trolls") most often abuse the patent litigation system. One of those bills, introduced by Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Protection Chairwoman Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), would create a registry of demand letters that law firms send to accused infringers on behalf of their non-practicing entity clients. In the House, Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) introduced draft legislation just this week that seeks to require patent infringement demand letters to include certain information to help recipient companies investigate the allegations. Hearings on that draft legislation are to be held today.
The Senate has approximately two months in session remaining until the August break and legislation focused on patent trolls during that time now seems very unlikely.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
