1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Made of Steel – New Buy American Act Rules Change Analysis and Increase Barriers to Offers of Foreign Manufactured End Products and Construction Material, Particularly for Iron or Steel Products

Made of Steel – New Buy American Act Rules Change Analysis and Increase Barriers to Offers of Foreign Manufactured End Products and Construction Material, Particularly for Iron or Steel Products

Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.14.20

Today, nearly 8 months after the deadline, the FAR Council has issued a proposed rule to implement E.O. 13881 (July 15, 2019) requiring consideration of increasing both the domestic content requirement under the Buy American Act and the associated price preference provided to domestic products. The proposed rule will do both and include new provisions applicable to end products or construction material “predominantly of iron or steel or a combination of both.” Most significantly, the proposed rule will:

  • Require non-COTS domestic end products and construction material to include domestic components that exceed 55% of the cost of all components for the end product; COTS end products, with the notable exception of the new category of items “predominantly of iron or steel or a combination of both” will continue to need only be manufactured in the United States to qualify as domestic.
  • Require domestic end products or construction material (including COTS items but except fasteners) consisting “predominately of iron or steel or a combination of both” to be manufactured in the U.S. and not incorporate foreign iron or steel that comprises 5% (on an estimated basis) or more of the costs of all components of the end product. To qualify as an item “predominately of iron or steel or combination of both” the total cost of iron and steel content in the item must exceed 50% of the cost of all components. Similar to rules applicable to Recovery Act procurements and DOT-funded programs, to qualify as domestic iron or steel “all manufacturing processes of the iron or steel must take place in the United States, except metallurgical processes involving refinement of steel additives.”
  • Fasteners are considered COTS products and need only be manufactured in the U.S.; the source of components, including the iron or steel does not matter.
  • The evaluation cost penalty for offers of end products or construction material that do not qualify as domestic is increased from 6% to 20%, and from 12% to 30% where the potential domestic awardee for the end product qualifies as a small business.

The comment period for the proposed rule extends through November 13, 2020.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights