1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |GDPR Compliance: The Beginning – Not the End

GDPR Compliance: The Beginning – Not the End

Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.25.18

Although the current focus of many companies regarding the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is on the May 25, 2018 effective date, we see that date as the beginning, not the end, of implementing a global GDPR compliance program. First, the risk-based GDPR framework for privacy and data security is an ongoing compliance process, not a “one-and-done” activity. Second, the EU Member State Data Protection Authorities (DPAs), charged with enforcing GDPR compliance, are grappling with how best to approach the operational issues that arise as entities interpret and implement GDPR’s data protection principles. Third, we expect the issuance of additional guidance that will potentially impact a number of companies’ activities, including the interaction between GDPR and the not-yet-final EU ePrivacy Regulation for online data activities. As a result, we expect to see DPA interpretations of GDPR, including through enforcement activities, that will provide clearer compliance guidance.

Organizations that are beginning to or in the process of developing and implementing compliance programs should keep the following general principles in mind:

  • Don’t panic, but focus on high-risk priorities in the processing of personal data, which will depend on type of business operations, size of organization, territorial scope, etc.
  • GDPR compliance is a risk-based assessment rather than an exercise in complying with black and white rules. Because risk management must be tailored to the activities of each entity, reasonable GDPR compliance will vary from entity to entity. Avoid copying what another entity does with regard to GDPR or using a template approach to GDPR compliance.
  • Entities that are active in the online advertising, marketing, and communications space need to make sure that their risk management activities under GDPR maintain sufficient flexibility to account for the not-yet-released EU ePrivacy Regulation.
  • Successful completion of a GDPR compliance project requires:
    • Support of senior management as a top-level priority, who should be fully informed of potential risks of non-compliance and briefed regarding compliance efforts on an ongoing basis.
    • Involvement of legal, HR, finance, marketing, IT, and other key stakeholders in order to have a 360-degree view of the activities impacting the collection and processing of personal data.
    • A point person with overall responsibility for GDPR compliance, whether a formal data protection officer (DPO), to the extent required under GDPR, or another individual assigned enterprise-wide responsibility for data protection. 
  • GDPR compliance involves amending contracts, policies, and notices, but it is not a paper exercise. Most importantly, organizations should use GDPR compliance as the motivation to carefully assess all the ways in which personal data are handled and how the organization can adapt its existing processes and systems, and create awareness throughout the whole organization to change the approach towards personal data.

Crowell & Moring’s GDPR practice will continue to post alerts regarding key GDPR updates and guidance on our blog and conduct periodic webinars and live programs on GDPR implementation and enforcement developments. For more information, please see our GDPR overview.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....