EU Consumer Product Safety Law Update
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.31.14
The European Commission has been active this summer in its efforts to advance consumer safety in the European Union. Here are highlights of recent notable events:
In-app Purchases. The EU has moved to address consumer protection related to in-app purchases, particularly those made by children, which follows the announcement of similar enforcement actions in the U.S. This is the first time that the Commission and member states have joined forces to coordinate enforcement, as provided for in the Consumer Protection Cooperation Regulation (No. 2006/2004). The authorities have requested that steps be taken to prevent inadvertent in-app purchases, such as adequately informing consumers about how purchases are made and paid for, and have asked for concrete solutions from industry actors, including Google and Apple.
BPA in Toys. On June 25, 2014, the Commission announced a strict limit for Bisphenol A (BPA) in toys intended for children under 3 years old or toys intended to be placed in the mouth (0.1 mg/l migration limit). This action makes mandatory the BPA limit in the existing toy standard, EN 71.
Geographical Indicators for Products. The Commission initiated a Green Paper consultation on July 15, 2014, relating to the possible protection of geographical indications for non-agricultural products. Geographical indicators provide information about the place of origin for certain goods. Currently, there is harmonized EU legislation relating to geographical indicators for agricultural and food products, but protections for non-agricultural products are currently provided for only in national laws. The Commission supports harmonization for non-agricultural products, stating that existing laws vary and are insufficient to ensure fair competition and to provide consumers with reliable information about products. This follows the European Parliament's vote in April in favor of requiring mandatory country of origin labeling for non-food products to be included in the proposed draft Consumer Product Safety Regulation.
Button Batteries. The EU, along with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and Health Canada, joined OECD's global campaign to raise awareness for button battery safety, following several fatal incidents involving children in Europe. EU Consumer Policy Commissioner Neven Mimica called for increased awareness and asked that manufacturers account for button battery hazards in designing products. This builds on a history of products being recalled in the EU because of button battery hazards.
Nickel Limits for Toys. On July 1, 2014, the Commission announced it would exempt electric toys from the nickel limits for toys, relating to sensitization and ingestion of toxic levels of nickel, noting that the main hazard to children is via inhalable fumes.
Consumer Rights Directive. The Consumer Rights Directive (2011/83/EU) entered into force on June 13, 2014. The Directive strengthens consumers' rights when purchasing products in Europe. Key provisions include enhanced price transparency, providing consumers with 14 days to return products, banning surcharges for using credit cards, and prohibiting pre-ticked boxes on websites involving additional payments.
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 01.16.25
Yesterday, less than an hour into the first day of confirmation hearings for attorney general nominee Pam Bondi, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) questioned Bondi on her commitment to defending the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) if she is confirmed. Bondi responded that she would “of course” defend the constitutionality of the FCA and that she understands the importance of whistleblowers, the FCA’s protections, and “the money it brings back to our country.” Senator Grassley’s questioning indicated he was focused on the FCA’s qui tam provisions, as it comes on the heels of U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, Inc., -- F.Supp.3d --, 2024 WL 4349242 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 30, 2024), a first-of-its-kind decision from Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, who held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions improperly appoint a relator “an officer of the United States” in violation of the Appointments Clause in Article II of the Constitution, and are therefore unconstitutional. Senator Grassley appeared to be seeking assurances about Bondi’s willingness to ensure the Department of Justice continues to defend the FCA’s qui tam provisions and commit the resources necessary to do so.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.15.25
Congress Has Spoken: DoD Unilateral Definitizations are Appealable Government Claims
Client Alert | 3 min read | 01.15.25
Speedbump or Roadblock?: Complaint Challenges New Hart-Scott-Rodino Rules
Client Alert | 5 min read | 01.15.25
State Antitrust Enforcement: A Continued Focus on Competition During the New Administration