DOJ Announces Antitrust Strike Force Focused on Public Procurements
Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.06.19
In the wake of recent criminal bid rigging cases involving government contractors, the Justice Department Antitrust Division is escalating its focus on collusion in public procurement. The Antitrust Division yesterday announced the formation of an interagency strike force dedicated to the deterrence, investigation and prosecution of antitrust violations by defense and other firms selling to the government. The Procurement Collusion Strike Force (PCSF) will include prosecutors from the Antitrust Division and 13 U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, as well as investigators from the FBI, Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General, and the General Services Administration Office of Inspector General.
Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim stated that the two main objectives of the PCSF are to deter and prevent collusive behavior among government contractors, and to detect, investigate and prosecute efforts to rig bids, fix prices and allocate bids. To that end, the “PCSF will train and educate procurement officials nationwide to recognize and report suspicious conduct in procurement, grant and program funding processes.” This outreach will include not only federal, state, and local procurement officials, but also government contractors and trade associations.
Delrahim estimated that last year, the federal government spent over $550 billion on goods and services. He added that the government is no less affected by anticompetitive conduct than any other customer, but explained that, in matters involving the government, it is the American taxpayer who is cheated. He also revealed that over a third of the Antitrust Division’s current investigations “relate to public procurement or otherwise involve the government being victimized by criminal conduct.”
Delrahim emphasized that the PCSF “will devote significant energy and resources to protecting the integrity of the government procurement process by ensuring competition in this critical sector of our nation’s economy.”
Delrahim’s speech comes on the heels of an appearance by Richard Powers, the Antitrust Division’s Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Criminal Enforcement, at the ABA’s Public Procurement Symposium on October 25. At that event, Powers underscored the need for competition and highlighted that part of the Antitrust Division’s core mission is to protect taxpayer money by preventing and prosecuting anticompetitive conduct in public procurements. Powers warned that violations of criminal antitrust laws in public procurements can result not only in prison time and significant fines but also in debarment of government contractors. He noted that government procurements are particularly vulnerable to collusion given the size and volume of federal contracts and the small pool of qualified bidders.
The full text of the announcement can be found here, and Assistant Attorney General Delrahim’s speech is available here.
Crowell & Moring has represented numerous government contractors and other companies in criminal and civil antitrust matters and has counseling and training materials available on relevant topics.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.03.25
COFC Holds That Federal PLA Mandate Is Unlawful; Reinterprets Blue and Gold Waiver Rule
In MVL USA, Inc. et al. v. United States, the United States Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) held that the provisions of FAR 22.505, 52.222-33 and 52.222-34 (collectively, the “PLA mandate”), which required the use of project labor agreements (“PLAs”) on large-scale federal construction projects valued above or at a certain threshold, violated the Competition in Contracting Act (“CICA”). As we previously reported here, former-President Biden issued Executive Order 14063 in February 2022, instructing federal agencies to require construction contractors and subcontractors on projects valued at $35 million or more to “agree, for that project, to negotiate or become a party to” a PLA. A few months later, the FAR Council promulgated a final rule implementing the executive order in FAR 22.505, 52.222-33 and 52.222-34.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 01.31.25
California Law Revision Commission Votes To Propose Expansive Changes to California’s Antitrust Laws
Client Alert | 4 min read | 01.31.25
Client Alert | 4 min read | 01.31.25