Congress Passes Combined COVID-19 Relief and Omnibus Spending Bill
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.23.20
The U.S. Congress passed a combined COVID-Relief and Omnibus Spending Bill on Monday, December 21, 2020. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021—both funded the U.S. government for FY 2021 and included a variety of COVID-19-related relief measures. The COVID-19 bill includes about $900 billion in new federal spending. It also repurposes $429 billion in unused CARES Act funding for the Federal Reserve Main Street Lending Program. The combined appropriations-COVID-19 stimulus relief package is the second largest in the nation’s history behind the CARES Act passed earlier this year.
President Trump is threatening a veto of the bill which may prompt further Congressional action to override his veto or to draft and pass new legislation which would increase the amount of stimulus checks from $600 to $2,000 per qualified American. It could also prompt Congress to pass a new Continuing Resolution (CR) to fund the U.S. government from the current CR termination date of December 28, 2020 into next year without overriding the President’s veto and with the COVID-19 Relief and Omnibus Spending Bill passed by Congress not becoming law. However, regardless of the Congressional response to the President, the main provisions of the bill summarized below are not expected to change, but rather, are expected to be in the final passed legislation if Congress overrides the veto or the President decides to sign the bill in the coming days.
The bill most notably currently includes:
- Stimulus checks - $600 in direct payments to certain qualified Americans
- Unemployment compensation – up to $300 a week in enhanced benefits
- Payroll Protection Program (PPP) - $284 billion in new funding for businesses
- COVID-19 Response Funding - direct new funding including:
- $20 billion for additional COVID-19 testing capacity
- $20 billion for additional COVID-19 vaccine purchases
- $8 billion for COVID-19 vaccine distribution
The combined package had broad bipartisan support in Congress with a vote in favor of the legislation of 359-53 in the House and 92-6 in the Senate. To find consensus, Democrats and Republicans alike were forced to abandon key tenets of earlier proposals. Democrats agreed to drop a provision that would have delivered funding to state and local governments and in return Republicans dropped a provision that would have granted businesses broad liability protections in the return to work effort.
It is likely that any stimulus negotiations early in the Biden Administration will begin with those partisan priorities in mind. Congressional Democrats and the President-Elect have indicated that another round of stimulus measures will be the first order of business following inauguration. Republicans have yet to voice support for future relief spending, although Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who is undoubtedly closely watching the Georgia Senate run-offs that will decide the majority of the Senate in 2021, says he and the Republican caucus will consider a potential future Biden stimulus package.
Stacie Heller, Senior Policy Director at Crowell & Moring, also contributed to this alert.
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.16.24
Over the past several years, federal courts have increasingly questioned the authority of administrative law judges (ALJs) to adjudicate alleged violations of certain labor and employment statutes. In the last several weeks, two U.S. district courts in Texas issued decisions halting unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on the grounds that NLRB ALJs lack the constitutional authority to preside over such actions due to unconstitutional protections against their removal.[1] Similarly, the last year has seen several decisions by courts in the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits finding that ALJs, whose decisions are not reviewable by a Presidential appointee, lack constitutional authority under the Appointments Clause to adjudicate claims.[2] The trend illustrated by these decisions, combined with the Supreme Court’s decision in June to abandon the Chevron doctrine of extending deference to federal agency rule-making proceedings, portend significant changes in the way employers interact with federal agencies that enforce labor and employment law.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.15.24
Department of Defense Plans Increased Investment in Clean Energy
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.15.24