IRS Commissioner Nominee Daniel Werfel Testifies Before Senate Finance Committee
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.24.23
On February 15th, Daniel Werfel, the nominee for IRS Commissioner, testified before the Senate Finance Committee during his nomination hearing. As expected, Werfel faced tough questioning about how he would oversee the use of $80 billion in new funding coming to the IRS over the next decade. The Inflation Reduction Act, which passed late last year, appropriated the additional funding for the IRS to increase compliance and provide better customer service to taxpayers.
Republicans have criticized the additional funding, citing fears that the investment in the IRS will increase audits of individual and small business taxpayers. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen addressed this concern, stating that the new funding will not be used to increase the audit rate for households making under $400,000 a year. Werfel committed during his nomination hearing to following Secretary Yellen’s directive.
Werfel testified that, if confirmed, “the audit and compliance priorities will be focused on enhancing the IRS’ capabilities to ensure that America’s highest earners comply with applicable tax laws.” As a result, we expect to see more coordinated and potentially more aggressive audits of high-earning individuals and corporations.
Werfel also testified that, if confirmed, he would focus on modernizing the IRS, improving taxpayer service, overhauling the agency’s technology systems, and adding additional IRS employees in customer service roles and with expertise in complex tax matters. The tax community has lamented the IRS’s customer service capabilities and outdated systems for years and these proposed modernization efforts are a welcome, much needed change.
We will continue to follow the IRS’s enforcement efforts as they develop and provide updates.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
