Compound Interest On CAS
Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.31.07
In Raytheon Co. (Aug. 22, 2007), the ASBCA held that segment closing adjustments under CAS 413 should be treated as "CAS noncompliances," making interest due on the adjustment from the date of the segment closing, and that the interest calculation is to be compounded daily because the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) requires that the IRS interest rate applicable by cross-reference from the CAS statute be compounded daily. It does not appear that the contractor argued -- and the Board therefore did not address -- that the CAS statute incorporates into CAS only the section of the IRC containing the interest rate, 28 U.S.C. 6621, not the section of the IRC requiring compounding daily, 28 U.S.C. 6622, or that the interest rate due for contracts awarded before the cross-reference to the IRC was added to the CAS statute should be subject to the prior rates that applied to those contracts.
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.09.26
Is Stock-a-palooza Over? Supreme Court allows SEC to Pursue Disgorgement
On June 4, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can continue to pursue disgorgement as an equitable remedy in securities fraud cases without showing pecuniary loss by investors. The Court’s ruling in Sripetch v. SEC resolves a split between the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which concluded that the SEC must demonstrate pecuniary loss, and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First and Ninth Circuits, which declined to require such a showing.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.09.26
Client Alert | 7 min read | 06.09.26
Client Alert | 11 min read | 06.08.26
