<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:55:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <title>
    </title>
    <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5a01ce0d-3e0e-43a7-9fe4-1b8d5967cb12</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Court and Agency E-Discovery Rules and Guidelines</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Federal-Court-and-Agency-E-Discovery-Rules-and-Guidelines</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7d24549-e443-4ae0-88c7-e89d09c7c368</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Court Invokes FRE 502(d) to Permit Intentional Production of Privileged Materials Without Waiver</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Court-Invokes-FRE-502d-to-Permit-Intentional-Production-of-Privileged-Materials-Without-Waiver</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e81d119a-6e49-4e9f-b22a-f303922431ac</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Government Forced to Waive Privilege For Failing to Preserve Documents in FCA Case</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Government-Forced-to-Waive-Privilege-For-Failing-to-Preserve-Documents-in-FCA-Case</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9326520e-c9e8-41d2-8f6c-dc6787ce120e</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Spoliation in Civil Litigation Charged as Criminal Obstruction of Justice</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Spoliation-in-Civil-Litigation-Charged-as-Criminal-Obstruction-of-Justice</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">06c28b47-5f74-4e17-ae0b-4d22f0fb6b47</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:49:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>ITC Publishes Proposed Rules to Limit E-Discovery and Address Privilege Issues</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/ITC-Publishes-Proposed-Rules-to-Limit-E-Discovery-and-Address-Privilege-Issues</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a0384aa-5ee0-401d-92d3-0ecaecdf4267</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:24:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Finalizes Changes to Rules Governing Investigatory Procedures, Primarily to Address Issues Regarding Electronically Stored Information</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/FTC-Finalizes-Changes-to-Rules-Governing-Investigatory-Procedures-Primarily-to-Address-Issues-Regarding-Electronically-Stored-Information</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b705a29f-a839-4b79-87d8-3b631650032c</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:47:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Appeals Court Finds Encrypted Data Beyond Reach of Government Investigators</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Appeals-Court-Finds-Encrypted-Data-Beyond-Reach-of-Government-Investigators</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">804913fd-7e26-4c2b-bb8c-d28fee2d09ca</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:41:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Court Imposes Broad Preservation Obligation Regarding Potential Class Members in FLSA Action</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Federal-Court-Imposes-Broad-Preservation-Obligation-Regarding-Potential-Class-Members-in-FLSA-Action</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3a408081-c2ad-41df-a8d6-5fc775269f56</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Proposes Changes to Rules Governing Investigatory Procedures, Primarily to Address Issues Regarding Electronically Stored Information</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/FTC-Proposes-Changes-to-Rules-Governing-Investigatory-Procedures-Primarily-to-Address-Issues-Regarding-Electronically-Stored-Information</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5be8be8e-b455-447f-a308-9f1835db8601</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:50:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Rambus Redux: Federal Circuit Reconciles District Court Split Regarding When Duty To Preserve Is Triggered</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Rambus-Redux-Federal-Circuit-Reconciles-District-Court-Split-Regarding-When-Duty-To-Preserve-Is-Triggered</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34ea8ee8-bf47-4d92-91ed-fd8bf03c320f</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Ninth Circuit En Banc Panel Affirms Fourth Amendment Principles But Steps Back From Required Protocol For Computer Search Warrants</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Ninth-Circuit-En-Banc-Panel-Affirms-Fourth-Amendment-Principles-But-Steps-Back-From-Required-Protocol-For-Computer-Search-Warrants</link>
      <description>In a September 13, 2010, ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an amended opinion that is likely to have a significant influence on the seizure of Electronically Stored Information ("ESI") by the government pursuant to search warrants.  The court revisited yet again its prior decisions in United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing Inc. ("CDT"), removing the explicit and controversial restrictions on search warrants that it previously adopted for ESI and instead demoting those rules to the level of suggested guidance in a concurring opinion.  United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing Inc., 9th Cir., No. 05-10067, en banc amended opinion Sept. 13, 2010.   </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1534a345-c217-491f-a4c2-710c53a155c3</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Leading Judge Issues Seminal 89-Page Opinion Imposing Harsh Sanctions for Spoliation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Leading-Judge-Issues-Seminal-89-Page-Opinion-Imposing-Harsh-Sanctions-for-Spoliation</link>
      <description>In a sweeping 89-page ruling issued on September 9, 2010, Chief Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm of the District of Maryland granted a default judgment against defendants Creative Pipe, Inc. and its president Mark Pappas based on a finding that Pappas had intentionally destroyed electronic evidence.  In addition, because of the egregious conduct that he found to have taken place, Judge Grimm imposed a civil contempt sanction on Pappas of up to two years in prison unless and until he pays the plaintiff's legal fees and costs associated with the spoliation and the ensuing motions practice.  (Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93644 (D. Md. Sept. 9, 2010). </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1f8e2f8b-2bff-4afa-b017-5e756aae2832</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court Rules that Government Search of Employee's Text Messages Was Reasonable</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Supreme-Court-Rules-that-Government-Search-of-Employees-Text-Messages-Was-Reasonable</link>
      <description>On Thursday the Supreme Court took a first step towards defining the rights of public employees in the digital age when it unanimously held that a police department's review of an employee's on-the-job text messages was "reasonable" within the scope of the Fourth Amendment. This decision has implications for practitioners across a range of substantive areas of practice, from privacy and e-discovery to employment law.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">05326789-f172-4636-92a8-0922451979e3</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>U.S. Courts Order Discovery Despite Foreign Privacy Laws</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/US-Courts-Order-Discovery-Despite-Foreign-Privacy-Laws</link>
      <description>Two recent opinions by federal district courts in New York highlight the ongoing tension between U.S. discovery rules and foreign "blocking statues" and privacy laws. These two cases continue a trend of U.S. courts ordering parties to produce discovery materials located outside the U.S. even when such production might violate foreign laws. These cases have important implications for anyone who litigates in U.S. courts for or against parties that maintain documents or electronically stored information outside the U.S. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f740b6d1-a239-48c9-b72e-a1b94e9427a0</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Spoliation Sanctions: A Tale of Two Courts</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Spoliation-Sanctions-A-Tale-of-Two-Courts</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f74b216b-6c69-4a17-9e7d-be5b9d5d380f</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Working Party Offers Guidance On Discovery For Cross-Border Civil Litigation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/European-Working-Party-Offers-Guidance-On-Discovery-For-Cross-Border-Civil-Litigation-1352184</link>
      <description>Multinational companies with operations both in the U.S. and Europe are keenly aware of the conflict between European data protection laws and U.S. discovery requirements. Compliance with discovery rules are clear legal obligations for entities facing litigation in the U.S. However, the handling of European personal data to comply with these legal obligations may breach the national laws in Europe implementing the requirements of Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) (the "Directive"). </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50be4185-2fc6-44fb-9ad5-99f9b67e8c04</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Proposed FTC Final Interim Rules Regarding Adjudicatory Proceedings</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Proposed-FTC-Final-Interim-Rules-Regarding-Adjudicatory-Proceedings</link>
      <description>On January 13, 2009, the FTC issued interim final rules amending Parts 3 and 4 of its Rules of Practice for Adjudicative Proceedings (16 C.F.R. Parts 3 and 4) (FTC Rules). The Rules were drafted to improve the efficiency of Part 3 proceedings, and, among other things, address the discovery of electronically stored information (ESI). The rules pertaining to ESI closely mirror the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Federal Rules) that went into effect on December 1, 2006. Although these are agency rules of practice, the FTC will likely seek guidance from the Federal Rules, the Committee Notes, and the evolving case law interpreting the Federal Rules.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e86f6b39-d713-44ff-9686-b22a3c332801</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Newly Published SEC Enforcement Manual Addresses E-Discovery</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Newly-Published-SEC-Enforcement-Manual-Addresses-E-Discovery</link>
      <description>The Securities and Exchange Commission published on its website its new "Enforcement Manual." The Enforcement Manual specifically addresses E-discovery issues in § 3.2.6.2.3. The Manual "encourages" the Staff to request document productions in electronic format (on CD, DVD or hard drive media) and specifies that the Staff's requests should include the Division's technical data standards. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">def8ec4e-fc3f-410f-a975-da1b9cf8ab52</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Judge Paul Grimm Weighs In on Parties’ Duties to Cooperate in Discovery</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Judge-Paul-Grimm-Weighs-In-on-Parties-Duties-to-Cooperate-in-Discovery</link>
      <description>There has been ongoing debate about the extent to which litigants actually will engage in earlier and more effective cooperation to control escalating e-discovery costs, versus the extent to which "discovery about the discovery" will continue to be a "gotcha" game of tactics that further drives up costs and distracts from the merits of litigation. Chief Magistrate Judge Paul Grimm put his finger on the scale in an opinion issued last week that is certain to gain notice.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33e03556-47ae-4aa5-811d-9d52813f6878</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Congress Passes New Federal Rule of Evidence to Address Privilege Issues</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Congress-Passes-New-Federal-Rule-of-Evidence-to-Address-Privilege-Issues</link>
      <description>Yesterday, the House of Representatives approved a bill that would amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to add new Rule 502, which addresses waiver of the attorney-client privilege and work product protection. The text of the new Rule is provided below. The House approved the same version of a bill unanimously approved by the Senate in February, and did so without amendment. The bill is now headed to the President's desk for signature and is expected to become law in December of this year. The new Rule would apply to proceedings commenced after the effective date and to proceedings pending on that date "insofar as is just and practicable," thus leaving the determination of retroactive application to the courts on a case-by-case basis.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fc413d12-2b90-4fdb-8abc-81327ce47a23</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court Approves E-Discovery Amendments to FRCP</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Electronic-Discovery-Information-Management-Alert/Supreme-Court-Approves-E-Discovery-Amendments-to-FRCP</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>