<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 13:23:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <title>
    </title>
    <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e21bda42-b3da-4653-8642-1b4d362f5503</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 13:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification Form Required as of May 7, 2013</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-Form-I-9-Employment-Eligibility-Verification-Form-Required-as-of-May-7-2013</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f3627eaa-a0ec-41c1-a0a0-796fbace2672</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:23:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court Holds that FLSA Collective Action Must be Dismissed Because Named Plaintiff’s Claims Became Moot After Her Rejection of Offer of Judgment</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Supreme-Court-Holds-that-FLSA-Collective-Action-Must-be-Dismissed-Because-Named-Plaintiffs-Claims-Became-Moot-After-Her-Rejection-of-Offer-of-Judgment</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30b15575-82fc-44a0-b940-dab0f3e994a4</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:42:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Court Rules Hospitals Contracting with FEHBP HMO are "Subcontractors" Subject to Federal Affirmative Action Requirements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Federal-Court-Rules-Hospitals-Contracting-with-FEHBP-HMO-are-Subcontractors-Subject-to-Federal-Affirmative-Action-Requirements</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a35c8ff-86ca-4a8d-8371-b279f99e5307</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:52:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New York City Employers Beware – New Law Prohibiting Unemployment Discrimination to Take Effect in June</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-York-City-Employers-Beware-New-Law-Prohibiting-Unemployment-Discrimination-to-Take-Effect-in-June</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b48eacfe-2aab-4bb5-a9c9-a5fa9d1330c1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:09:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>401k Plan Investment Selection Triggers ERISA Violation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/401k-Plan-Investment-Selection-Triggers-ERISA-Violation</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8173eb08-bbc7-495e-8bea-782324ebba4f</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:20:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Third Circuit Upholds Reduced Pleading Requirements for SOX Whistleblowers</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Third-Circuit-Upholds-Reduced-Pleading-Requirements-for-SOX-Whistleblowers</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5bf17a9e-478b-49bc-aa60-8cfa6577b5ac</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Good News for Goldman: Second Circuit Requires Individual Arbitration of Title VII Claim</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Good-News-for-Goldman-Second-Circuit-Requires-Individual-Arbitration-of-Title-VII-Claim</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">369d6638-a6fd-4d5f-9bea-957942485aa5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>DOL Issues Guidance on Additional Annual Funding Notice Disclosures  for Single-Employer Defined Benefit Plans</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/DOL-Issues-Guidance-on-Additional-Annual-Funding-Notice-Disclosures-for-Single-Employer-Defined-Benefit-Plans</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a4976f1c-f154-4e1b-9489-efe04cc4a9b5</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New OFCCP Compensation "Guidance" Offers Little to Guide Contractors</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-OFCCP-Compensation-Guidance-Offers-Little-to-Guide-Contractors</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9c230bf1-e843-4828-affd-2045dfd781f0</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Employees' Entitlement to Leave for Pregnancy Disability not Limited to Four Months</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-Employees-Entitlement-to-Leave-for-Pregnancy-Disability-not-Limited-to-Four-Months</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20bcd3f7-e140-4110-a940-c8be7bfaea6e</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>U.S. Department of Labor Publishes New FMLA Regulations that Significantly Expand Military Leave Provisions and Modify Eligibility Rules for Airline Flight Crews</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/US-Department-of-Labor-Publishes-New-FMLA-Regulations-that-Significantly-Expand-Military-Leave-Provisions-and-Modify-Eligibility-Rules-for-Airline-Flight-Crews</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b560c56-d920-4702-b5fa-503363a1e597</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:31:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>No Feasible Trial Plan – No Class Action</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/No-Feasible-Trial-Plan-No-Class-Action</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8c28e4b3-e65a-437f-abcd-d22b074b211b</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:02:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Supreme Court Approves Partial Mixed Motive Defense Under FEHA</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-Supreme-Court-Approves-Partial-Mixed-Motive-Defense-Under-FEHA</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e340fdba-3bdc-4efb-97d8-308165bc0431</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Employee Accused of Discrimination Barred from Proceeding With Own Discrimination and Defamation Claims</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-Employee-Accused-of-Discrimination-Barred-from-Proceeding-With-Own-Discrimination-and-Defamation-Claims</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e85811f5-961f-47d6-9d26-17adf2830d55</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>In the Wake of Canning - Turmoil at the NLRB Because of Recess Appointments</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/In-the-Wake-of-Canning-Turmoil-at-the-NLRB-Because-of-Recess-Appointments</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a49efeae-4b05-460c-a435-8d3ad54248c7</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:01:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Employment Law Developments for 2013</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-Employment-Law-Developments-for-2013</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1acb24-5ace-4519-bea0-6dc846bdf6b1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:13:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Brinker Warrants Certification of Meal and Rest Break Class Claims in Two Recent California Decisions</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Brinker-Warrants-Certification-of-Meal-and-Rest-Break-Class-Claims-in-Two-Recent-California-Decisions</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a11be899-768d-43a7-8dd1-794e9df8e2ea</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:16:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Overturns 50-Year Precedent on Dues-Checkoff</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Overturns-50-Year-Precedent-on-Dues-Checkoff</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ccf26dd1-9a0b-4cb8-b9af-64d34dffd74e</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:27:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Family Leave – Employer's Honest Belief That Employee Took Leave For Improper Reason Not Enough to Justify Discharge</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-Family-Leave-Employers-Honest-Belief-That-Employee-Took-Leave-For-Improper-Reason-Not-Enough-to-Justify-Discharge</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a37b65c3-07a7-4f5f-9f3a-5db14bea6eaa</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:25:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Lead Plaintiff's Failure to Report Alleged Unpaid Work Time Under The Employer's Reporting Policies Dooms FLSA Collective Action</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Lead-Plaintiffs-Failure-to-Report-Alleged-Unpaid-Work-Time-Under-The-Employers-Reporting-Policies-Dooms-FLSA-Collective-Action</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">29f9e04c-f3f7-4f47-82af-075b474b7fa0</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Participants in TRICARE Program Celebrate the Administrative Review Board's Florida Hospital Decision – Should Other Companies Care?</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Participants-in-TRICARE-Program-Celebrate-the-Administrative-Review-Boards-Florida-Hospital-Decision-Should-Other-Companies-Care</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4b25d86-6136-48bc-b356-96956d6b0235</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:34:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Appellate Court Approves (Finally) of Neutral Time Rounding</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-Appellate-Court-Approves-Finally-of-Neutral-Time-Rounding</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">38fa0e35-b31d-4ca5-9f27-c378914582c9</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:46:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Says "Yes," You Can Be Fired for Something You Post Online</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Says-Yes-You-Can-Be-Fired-for-Something-You-Post-Online</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">44e866e7-69e9-4d51-85ad-0ccd93d99b4d</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Issues its First Social Media Policy Decision</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Issues-its-First-Social-Media-Policy-Decision</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c1478e1d-d9c2-468b-9623-ed836e1e25fe</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Enacts Legislation that Substantially Broadens Employers' Obligations to Provide Religious Accommodations</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-Enacts-Legislation-that-Substantially-Broadens-Employers-Obligations-to-Provide-Religious-Accommodations</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a4ba1b73-8bb0-4fbc-9495-318d3f9371ee</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Rules Against Routine Requests for Confidentiality in Ongoing Employer Investigations</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Rules-Against-Routine-Requests-for-Confidentiality-in-Ongoing-Employer-Investigations</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fdea9683-bc4b-42da-a363-1ab9440a3b65</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>DOL Issues WARN Act Guidance to Federal Contractors in Light of Sequestration</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/DOL-Issues-WARN-Act-Guidance-to-Federal-Contractors-in-Light-of-Sequestration</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ba7922a-c777-407f-abe4-8cf489220d91</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:26:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The NLRB's Acting General Counsel Asserts an Unprecedented Challenge to Employee Handbook Receipt Provisions</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/The-NLRBs-Acting-General-Counsel-Asserts-an-Unprecedented-Challenge-to-Employee-Handbook-Receipt-Provisions</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">842add40-330a-4b10-9628-d9c2d6f7730a</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Seventh Circuit Authorizes An "Issue Class Action" in Response to Dukes</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Seventh-Circuit-Authorizes-An-Issue-Class-Action-in-Response-to-Dukes</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6037fd79-54b9-4242-b0c8-800ad18056d8</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California High Court Rejects Fee Request For Rest Break Claims</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-High-Court-Rejects-Fee-Request-For-Rest-Break-Claims</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d4acbfe-9813-4667-8bc0-8a5d6878195d</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Notice Posting Rule Delayed</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Notice-Posting-Rule-Delayed</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23df10d4-a929-4488-b7bd-3463d63b9618</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:12:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Brinker – Was It Worth The Wait For Employers?</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Brinker-Was-It-Worth-The-Wait-For-Employers</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3411298-6a3b-4e5f-954b-80cbdd16b8c0</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:30:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Preparing For May Day, And Beyond, At The NLRB</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Preparing-For-May-Day-And-Beyond-At-The-NLRB</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5d1702e9-6b84-45c3-bf29-19070fd3d704</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:21:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Maryland Takes the Lead on Social Media Access Legislation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Maryland-Takes-the-Lead-on-Social-Media-Access-Legislation</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46fcd327-f266-470a-b88f-5bc5b3b68f94</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Transgender Employees Protected By Federal Law Against Discrimination</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Transgender-Employees-Protected-By-Federal-Law-Against-Discrimination</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">804913fd-7e26-4c2b-bb8c-d28fee2d09ca</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:41:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Court Imposes Broad Preservation Obligation Regarding Potential Class Members in FLSA Action</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Federal-Court-Imposes-Broad-Preservation-Obligation-Regarding-Potential-Class-Members-in-FLSA-Action</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aec0921a-6765-4130-97bd-431ae83b89b4</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California and the USDOL Stake Out Common Ground in Focusing on Alleged Misclassification of Employees as Independent Contractors</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-and-the-USDOL-Stake-Out-Common-Ground-in-Focusing-on-Alleged-Misclassification-of-Employees-as-Independent-Contractors</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4a117d58-b28f-4f1c-b648-f07c7d0121b4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:33:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Department of Labor Proposes FMLA Rule on Leave for Caregivers to Servicemembers and Airline Flight Crew Employees</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Department-of-Labor-Proposes-FMLA-Rule-on-Leave-for-Caregivers-to-Servicemembers-and-Airline-Flight-Crew-Employees</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">777c6dd8-d8cc-40ac-ac02-49d40c6bd8af</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:13:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Second Circuit Weighs in Again on Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Second-Circuit-Weighs-in-Again-on-Class-Action-Waivers-in-Arbitration-Agreements</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2957f031-36fa-4e20-aef8-8ced2448976b</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Clarifies Its Position Regarding Employees' Social Media Usage </title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Clarifies-Its-Position-Regarding-Employees-Social-Media-Usage</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d15621d6-548c-41c0-ba22-6d986f099208</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:19:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>“Collyer Lite” -- NLRB Announces Limitation on Collyer Deferral</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Collyer-Lite-NLRB-Announces-Limitation-on-Collyer-Deferral</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0226c407-618f-4421-8121-4968f76f3d0a</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:36:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FMLA Protections from Interference and Retaliation Extended to Pre-Eligible Employees</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/FMLA-Protections-from-Interference-and-Retaliation-Extended-to-Pre-Eligible-Employees</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">745a7c87-272c-4a61-bbf7-0790a041acad</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB and FINRA Signal Federal Push To Create A Right for Employees To Pursue Collective Litigation Regardless of Arbitration Agreements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-and-FINRA-Signal-Federal-Push-To-Create-A-Right-for-Employees-To-Pursue-Collective-Litigation-Regardless-of-Arbitration-Agreements</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d1eade4b-d84c-48cc-8f3d-6da9a2470fbb</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:29:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New DOT Regulations Require Commercial Truckers to Hit the "Breaks"</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-DOT-Regulations-Require-Commercial-Truckers-to-Hit-the-Breaks</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ddc518bf-bda0-47e2-8d0e-0256d899bf78</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Issues Final Rule On "Quickie" Elections</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Issues-Final-Rule-On-Quickie-Elections</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b5fc171-ba47-405c-b4bc-467703d4306f</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>"Sea Change" in OFCCP Disability Regulations Would Mean Increased Turbulence for Contractors</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Sea-Change-in-OFCCP-Disability-Regulations-Would-Mean-Increased-Turbulence-for-Contractors</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d69b4c05-6e9d-4eec-988f-49abde694ec5</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Scales Back -- But Not By Much -- The New "Quickie" Election Rules it Proposed on June 22, 2011</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Scales-Back-But-Not-By-Much-The-New-Quickie-Election-Rules-it-Proposed-on-June-22-2011</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6466479c-6c46-4448-a1a8-40dbced68c34</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:06:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Court Upholds OFCCP Demand For Data</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Federal-Court-Upholds-OFCCP-Demand-For-Data</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">21e3c520-6f47-450a-95b4-5ecfe5edde73</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>OSHA Revises Its Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Rules Impacting Public Companies and Their Affiliates and Subsidiaries</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/OSHA-Revises-Its-Sarbanes-Oxley-Whistleblower-Rules-Impacting-Public-Companies-and-Their-Affiliates-and-Subsidiaries</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">69fcdb97-6c7f-41fd-8bb2-29fbdbe3cc31</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Seating Lawsuits Meeting Resistance, But Employers Shouldn't Sit Idly By</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-Seating-Lawsuits-Meeting-Resistance-But-Employers-Shouldnt-Sit-Idly-By</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f4556644-a891-4560-b044-1421cec5af78</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:26:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Enacts Legislation Limiting Employers' Use of Consumer Credit Reports for Employment Purposes</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/California-Enacts-Legislation-Limiting-Employers-Use-of-Consumer-Credit-Reports-for-Employment-Purposes</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4021273c-b5de-40f6-bb19-9369d80b26cd</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Postpones Implementation of Its New Employee Rights Posting Requirement</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Postpones-Implementation-of-Its-New-Employee-Rights-Posting-Requirement</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a9c1fd7c-6740-4456-9a87-4c03bbecea40</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Seattle Enacts Ordinance Requiring Paid Sick Leave and Paid Safe Time</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Seattle-Enacts-Ordinance-Requiring-Paid-Sick-Leave-and-Paid-Safe-Time</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a18aa0a-7851-4b2e-9584-13f23f5e1c84</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:08:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Makes Employee Rights Poster Available on its Website Shortly After Commencement of a Lawsuit Challenging its Posting Rule</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Makes-Employee-Rights-Poster-Available-on-its-Website-Shortly-After-Commencement-of-a-Lawsuit-Challenging-its-Posting-Rule</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b2f451fe-d581-4956-94a4-ba35a03799e9</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>National Labor Relations Board Alters Landscape for Determining the Scope of Petitioned-For Bargaining Units</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/National-Labor-Relations-Board-Alters-Landscape-for-Determining-the-Scope-of-Petitioned-For-Bargaining-Units</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16a755a0-990a-452f-bd34-ec364f5d7578</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:22:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The NLRB Overrules Prior Decisions to Reinstate "Recognition Bar" Protection for Unions Voluntarily Recognized and "Successor Bar" Protection for Incumbent Unions</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/The-NLRB-Overrules-Prior-Decisions-to-Reinstate-Recognition-Bar-Protection-for-Unions-Voluntarily-Recognized-and-Successor-Bar-Protection-for-Incumbent-Unions</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a7b11e4a-bd32-4f97-9f47-8cd6d4b27b5d</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Imposes New Employee Rights Posting Requirement on Covered Employers</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Imposes-New-Employee-Rights-Posting-Requirement-on-Covered-Employers</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6578e69a-fab9-42cf-9b5e-7f6a6343b0b4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>OFCCP Seeks Input on Development of New Compensation Reporting Tool</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/OFCCP-Seeks-Input-on-Development-of-New-Compensation-Reporting-Tool</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be510e58-4d5f-4b23-b028-57d81edb0cfc</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>OFCCP Drumbeat Continues: Agency Announces New FAAP Procedures</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/OFCCP-Drumbeat-Continues-Agency-Announces-New-FAAP-Procedures</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b08280f-e57a-4d61-9b8b-5e12e3c77717</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The NLRB and USDOL Issue Controversial Proposed Regulations To Aid Union Organizing</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/The-NLRB-and-USDOL-Issue-Controversial-Proposed-Regulations-To-Aid-Union-Organizing</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1f73dada-d00a-4d62-b2c2-ff091d3d743c</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:22:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court Changes The Class Action Landscape In Dukes v. Wal-Mart</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Supreme-Court-Changes-The-Class-Action-Landscape-In-Dukes-v-Wal-Mart</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">72c01e0b-c09e-40a5-ae52-103b9a2cdf3e</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Trade Secret Misappropriation and Non-Competes Across (California) State Lines: What Law Governs?</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Trade-Secret-Misappropriation-and-Non-Competes-Across-California-State-Lines-What-Law-Governs</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8574b377-b12c-4548-bc0a-17acfb1905fd</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:17:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Connecticut to Become First State to Mandate Guaranteed Paid Sick-Leave Time for Employees</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Connecticut-to-Become-First-State-to-Mandate-Guaranteed-Paid-Sick-Leave-Time-for-Employees</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8755611e-02b6-451c-b4de-0e5f36bb5fad</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>EEOC Proposes to Extend Title VII and ADA Recordkeeping Requirements to Include Entities Covered by GINA</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/EEOC-Proposes-to-Extend-Title-VII-and-ADA-Recordkeeping-Requirements-to-Include-Entities-Covered-by-GINA</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">adb603c4-f53f-4cff-8dce-284625b5031b</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 10:32:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Fifth Circuit Applies Recent Supreme Court Decision to Revive Son's Title VII Retaliation Claim Based on Father's Protected Activity</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Fifth-Circuit-Applies-Recent-Supreme-Court-Decision-to-Revive-Sons-Title-VII-Retaliation-Claim-Based-on-Fathers-Protected-Activity</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f61fd86b-82fd-4b8f-9ffa-da83e555cc54</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 16:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Think That California Lawsuits Over Seating Concern Only Retail Cashiers? Think Again</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Think-That-California-Lawsuits-Over-Seating-Concern-Only-Retail-Cashiers-Think-Again</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">323207dc-70b3-4d75-8e47-b27c653c67c5</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:16:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Circuit Court Rules No Cause of Action for Discrimination Against Debtors</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Circuit-Court-Rules-No-Cause-of-Action-for-Discrimination-Against-Debtors</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23514881-d8c4-4575-bb9d-18741be4c745</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 10:51:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Sues Arizona in Federal Court over Constitutional Amendment Requiring Secret Ballot Elections for Union Representation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Sues-Arizona-in-Federal-Court-over-Constitutional-Amendment-Requiring-Secret-Ballot-Elections-for-Union-Representation</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">74fcc02a-0980-4313-9579-16ebdfbdbd88</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 11:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>You Wanna Sue Your Employer for Overtime? The Labor Department Has an App for That!</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/You-Wanna-Sue-Your-Employer-for-Overtime-The-Labor-Department-Has-an-App-for-That</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6f77b68b-b5a3-452a-b43d-17c2e0c6880a</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 16:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Philadelphia Is Latest Jurisdiction to "Ban the Box" in Hiring Processes</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Philadelphia-Is-Latest-Jurisdiction-to-Ban-the-Box-in-Hiring-Processes</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88e40de7-1f05-4d6f-bb29-71a750a5f37c</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New York State Department of Labor Issues Guidance and Sample Templates in Connection With the New York Wage Theft Prevention Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-York-State-Department-of-Labor-Issues-Guidance-and-Sample-Templates-in-Connection-With-the-New-York-Wage-Theft-Prevention-Act</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4b7d234-5b50-47e9-87e8-f660a8680e4e</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>EEOC Issues Final Regulations on ADA Amendments Act of 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/EEOC-Issues-Final-Regulations-on-ADA-Amendments-Act-of-2008</link>
      <description>The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") recently issued its final revised Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as Amended ("Regulations"), and accompanying interpretative guidance.  These final Regulations, which interpret the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 ("ADAAA"), will take effect on May 24, 2011.

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bd23a75b-2208-44b3-ada7-fc6787b25634</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New York Wage Theft Prevention Act Takes Effect on April 9, 2011</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-York-Wage-Theft-Prevention-Act-Takes-Effect-on-April-9-2011</link>
      <description>The New York Wage Theft Prevention Act ("Act"), effective April 9, 2011, implements new mandates regarding wage and hour notifications and recordkeeping for New York employers, and provides for increased civil and criminal penalties for their violation of these new and existing requirements. 

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fcde6ff1-c9f5-43d7-9eff-0920d3b88201</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:51:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>IRS Issues Guidance on Mandatory Form W-2 Informational Reporting of Employer-Sponsored Health Coverage</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/IRS-Issues-Guidance-on-Mandatory-Form-W-2-Informational-Reporting-of-Employer-Sponsored-Health-Coverage</link>
      <description>On March 29, 2011, the IRS issued Notice 2011-28 ("Notice"), which provides interim guidance to employers regarding the new Form W-2 reporting requirement for employer-sponsored group health coverage.  This requirement was added to the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") by last year's health reform legislation, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-149 ("PPACA").  The IRS has requested comments, which are due by June 27, 2010, on this interim guidance.

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d5a35e94-d02d-4b7a-91e5-e5f299416cd5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Oral Complaints are Sufficient to Support an FLSA Retaliation Claim</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Oral-Complaints-are-Sufficient-to-Support-an-FLSA-Retaliation-Claim</link>
      <description>The U.S. Supreme Court recently held, in Kasten v Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., that an employee who is discharged after orally complaining to his employer about wage and hour issues may bring a claim for retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").  An oral complaint, according to the Court, may be "sufficiently clear and detailed for a reasonable employer to understand it, in light of both content and context, as an assertion of rights protected by the statute and a call for their protection."  Employers must, in light of the Saint-Gobain decision, pay close attention to the manner in which they receive, respond to and address such oral complaints by employees.   

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ae779fc4-3ab1-4068-8d96-ddbf1ab512eb</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>NLRB Flexes Its Muscles by Opposing State Constitutional Amendments Requiring the Use of Secret Ballot Elections for Union Representation Purposes and Limiting Deferral to Arbitration</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/NLRB-Flexes-Its-Muscles-by-Opposing-State-Constitutional-Amendments-Requiring-the-Use-of-Secret-Ballot-Elections-for-Union-Representation-Purposes-and-Limiting-Deferral-to-Arbitration</link>
      <description>The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") has recently taken the position that state constitutional amendments mandating the use of secret ballot union representation elections for representation purposes violate the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"). Fueled by the desire to prevent intimidation and coercion by unions in the representation process, the voters of Arizona, South Dakota, South Carolina, and Utah have approved state constitutional amendments mandating that employees may choose union representation only through a secret ballot election. The NLRB, through its Acting General Counsel, Lafe Solomon, asserts that these amendments foreclose federally protected rights, and has requested that the four state Attorneys General work to prevent the amendments from taking effect.  Mr. Solomon, who has been nominated for a four-year term as NLRB General Counsel, has indicated that the NLRB will take legal action against any state that enforces the secret ballot requirement. 

...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3aa2b6d6-56c3-444d-aa14-8f583cfa7676</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New York State Hospitality Industry Wage Order Increases the Wages to Be Paid to Tipped Employees and Authorizes Tip Pooling and Tip Sharing</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-York-State-Hospitality-Industry-Wage-Order-Increases-the-Wages-to-Be-Paid-to-Tipped-Employees-and-Authorizes-Tip-Pooling-and-Tip-Sharing</link>
      <description>The New York State Department of Labor ("NYSDOL") has provided a holiday gift to employees in the hospitality industry by issuing a new Wage Order, effective January 1, 2011.  This Hospitality Industry Wage Order increases the portion of the $7.25 per hour New York State minimum wage that must be paid to tipped employees.  The NYSDOL has also clarified New York law regarding tip sharing and tip pooling.  These provisions cover tipped restaurant and hotel employees employed in New York State.  The tip credit requirements applicable to tipped employees working in other industries in New York State are covered by the Minimum Wage Order for Miscellaneous Industries and Occupations.  

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">712fa608-fef9-4a25-ba04-ecec834f0a1e</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Proposed OSHA Noise Regulations Reverse Long-Standing Interpretations And Increase Potential Costs To Employers</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Proposed-OSHA-Noise-Regulations-Reverse-Long-Standing-Interpretations-And-Increase-Potential-Costs-To-Employers</link>
      <description>On October 19, 2010, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration proposed changes to occupational noise standards that would significantly increase the cost and burden of compliance by employers in industry and the construction trades. The new interpretations change the focus of noise protection efforts from cost-effective and well-established personal protective equipment ("PPE") such as earplugs to substantially more expensive administrative and engineering controls such as replacing equipment with quieter models or isolating equipment away from employees.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f059f52-0bea-4864-bb64-279278138e9e</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Marijuana Legalization Under California's Proposition 19: The Impact on Employers</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Marijuana-Legalization-Under-Californias-Proposition-19-The-Impact-on-Employers</link>
      <description>California's Proposition 19, which, if approved by voters on November 2, 2010, would legalize various marijuana-related activities in California, has already generated a great deal of national attention.  In addition to vocal endorsements and opposition within California, in recent days U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder stated, in a letter to former federal drug enforcement chiefs, that, even if Proposition 19 passes, the federal government will "vigorously enforce" federal law (such as the Controlled Substances Act) making marijuana illegal.   Given the likely inconsistent enforcement of marijuana laws nationally and in the state if the proposition passes, the implications for employers in California continue to be a source of speculation.   </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e924dc0e-245f-46aa-87f4-260a0c8bd46f</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Court Rules Cancer in Remission Is Disability under the ADAAA</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Court-Rules-Cancer-in-Remission-Is-Disability-under-the-ADAAA</link>
      <description>A federal district court in Indiana recently ruled that a plaintiff's past diagnosis of renal cancer qualifies as a "disability" for purposes of the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 ("ADAAA"). The court reached this conclusion even though the plaintiff's cancer was in remission and he had been working with no restrictions for over a year. This case is significant because it is one of the first to decide the extent to which the ADAAA broadens the scope of what conditions may constitute a "disability." Before the enactment of the ADAAA, a medical condition often did not qualify as a "disability" if it was in remission or was episodic in nature. Under the ADAAA, however, a condition that is in remission or episodic in nature may qualify as a disability if it "would substantially limit a major life activity when active." 42 U.S.C. § 12102(4)(D). </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f562a8a4-2398-4fd4-8e61-325054d28c64</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New Whistleblower Incentives and Protections in the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-Whistleblower-Incentives-and-Protections-in-the-Dodd-Frank-Wall-Street-Reform-and-Consumer-Protection-Act</link>
      <description>The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), which became law at the end of July, contains new incentives for whistleblowers as well as enhanced whistleblower protections. These whistleblower provisions apply beyond the financial services industry, impacting public and private companies across all industries.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb7134a5-d326-40f3-97d7-dea76e64d023</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>D.C. Issues Final Regulations for Accrued Sick &amp;amp; Safe Leave Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/DC-Issues-Final-Regulations-for-Accrued-Sick-Safe-Leave-Act</link>
      <description>The District of Columbia recently issued the final regulations implementing the Accrued Sick and Safe Leave Act of 2008 ("ASSLA" or "the Act"). When the ASSLA went into effect on November 13, 2008, two key questions remained unanswered: 1) which employees are covered under the Act; and 2) when do employees begin to accrue and access leave under the Act? The final regulations answer these questions by clarifying the definition of "employee," especially for those who do not consistently work in the District of Columbia, and confirming that only "employees" (the definition of which was clarified) are eligible to accrue and access paid leave under the Act.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">962ece1a-bbea-420b-ae0f-591deccc43df</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Interim Rule Requires Federal Contractors to Report Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Interim-Rule-Requires-Federal-Contractors-to-Report-Executive-Compensation-and-First-Tier-Subcontract-Awards</link>
      <description> the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, which have responsibility for the development and maintenance of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FAR”) System, issued an interim rule requiring that covered federal contractors disclose information about the compensation paid to their five most highly compensated executives, and to the highest paid executives of their first-tier subcontractors.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1f71650e-a5f1-46b5-9dbc-7100cbc8baf6</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Health Care Reform Regulations Arrive – Now What?  What You Need to Know Right Now About Health Care Reform Regulations (So Far)</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Health-Care-Reform-Regulations-Arrive-Now-What-What-You-Need-to-Know-Right-Now-About-Health-Care-Reform-Regulations-So-Far</link>
      <description>As discussed in our May 12, 2010 Labor &amp; Employment Law Alert, in March 2010, President Obama signed into law both the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA") and the Health Care and Education Tax Credit Reconciliation Act ("HCERA"), which supplemented and modified PPACA (this Alert will refer to these two laws collectively as "Health Care Reform" or "Health Reform Laws"). As we noted in our May 12 Alert, Health Care Reform is an on-going process with compliance requirements developing over time, and the pace of those developments has proven to be quite impressive. To date, in just over 3 months since PPACA was signed into law, the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), Department of Labor ("DOL"), and Department of the Treasury ("Treasury") have jointly issued interim final rules on the following four major provisions of Health Care Reform: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b5fdae34-f17c-4bc6-ba58-54a1788eceaf</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division Provides Answers, Raises New Questions</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Department-of-Labors-Wage-and-Hour-Division-Provides-Answers-Raises-New-Questions</link>
      <description>Companies that require their employees to wear uniforms or protective equipment face a number of complicated issues: Is time spent donning and doffing required uniforms and equipment compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA")? If so, can the subject be negotiated with a different result through a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA")? What if the workforce is not represented by a union? In the end, does the donning of required uniforms or equipment qualify as a "principal activity" under the Portal to Portal Act, such that subsequent time (even if spent waiting to be engaged or traveling to the worksite) must be paid? </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fad9dd72-eed1-4e4d-9bd5-3651b1dfd847</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New Process Steel – The Supreme Court Sends The NLRB Back To The Drawing Board</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-Process-Steel-The-Supreme-Court-Sends-The-NLRB-Back-To-The-Drawing-Board</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court invalidated today almost 600 decisions issued by the two members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) who served for a 27-month period beginning in December, 2007. The Court, in a 5-4 opinion, ruled that the two member panel did not constitute a "quorum" authorized to decide cases under Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act. Section 3(b) is the statutory provision that sets forth the familiar three member panel quorum provisions used by the NLRB in deciding cases. The majority opinion was authored by Justice Stevens, and joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Associate Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito. Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayer, dissented, agreeing with the government's proposed reading of the statutory provision. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">52a0ac1e-51af-48ea-9e70-89a9eacd53df</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New Labor-Rights Poster Requirement for Federal Contractors</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-Labor-Rights-Poster-Requirement-for-Federal-Contractors</link>
      <description>All federal prime contractors who enter into contracts of $100,000 or more, and subcontractors who enter into contracts of greater than $10,000, arising from a solicitation issued by the government on or after June 21, 2010, must post a notice at each of their workplaces informing employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA").  A final rule, issued by the Department of Labor May 20, 2010, implements Executive Order 13496, signed by President Obama on January 30, 2009 to supplant the Bush-era "Beck Notice," and mandates the language of the notice. 
 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b194332-ec0a-45d7-8cc9-e6810cea3399</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>What Employers, Employees and Health Plans Need to Know Right Now About Health Care Reform</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/What-Employers-Employees-and-Health-Plans-Need-to-Know-Right-Now-About-Health-Care-Reform</link>
      <description>Health care reform has been the subject of much public debate and, in many cases, misinformation both about the actual content of the new laws and the ways in which the laws are to be applied and interpreted. Regardless of your point of view, it is clear that health care reform will have a significant impact, not only on the health insurance industry but also on employment and employee benefit issues generally. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b8f9a9e-840c-4b38-88ee-296ecf55126d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>What Should Large Employers Do Now? Implications of Dukes v. Wal-Mart</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/What-Should-Large-Employers-Do-Now-Implications-of-Dukes-v-Wal-Mart</link>
      <description>Earlier this week, the Ninth Circuit issued its long-anticipated en banc opinion in Dukes v. Wal-Mart. Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., __ F.3d. __, 2010 WL 1644259 (9th Cir. April 26, 2010). The six-judge majority affirmed the trial court's decision to certify a nationwide Title VII class action against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Beyond the simply breathtaking result and practical implications of the decision in the Dukes case -- approval of a class action involving up to 1.5 million current and former employees -- the opinion provides another wake-up call to all large employers regarding the risks they face in 2010 and beyond as they administer pay, promotion, and performance management systems that will be characterized by plaintiffs as involving subjectivity and discretion. Dukes, following on the heels of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in January 2009 and renewed attention at the federal level to the Paycheck Fairness Act, underscores ...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56936838-0ec2-48f4-94bd-c51f05c8a073</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Fourth Circuit Enforces Employee's Pre-Filing Release of Qui Tam Action under the False Claims Act, Dismisses Suit</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Fourth-Circuit-Enforces-Employees-Pre-Filing-Release-of-Qui-Tam-Action-under-the-False-Claims-Act-Dismisses-Suit</link>
      <description>The Fourth Circuit recently ruled that an employee who signed a general release of all federal, state and local claims in connection with his separation from his employer was subsequently barred from bringing a qui tam action under the False Claims Act (FCA). United States ex rel. Radcliffe v. Purdue Pharma, No. 09-1202, __ F.3d __ (4th Cir. 2010). The court held that where the federal government was aware of the fraudulent conduct prior to the filing of the qui tam action, the federal interest served by enforcing releases outweighed the need to provide incentives to individuals to bring qui tam claims. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40863a45-226c-485f-bb62-f868bffea2a1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Becker Means Change At The Labor Board</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Becker-Means-Change-At-The-Labor-Board</link>
      <description>President Obama has filled two of the three vacancies at the National Labor Relations Board with recess appointments. Joining union-side labor lawyer William Pierce is Craig Becker. Becker is a long-time senior lawyer for the SEIU, and has been a staff attorney with the AFL-CIO since 2004. Becker's appointment has generated enormous controversy. Senate Republicans unanimously joined business groups in opposing the nomination. The principal reason is concern that Becker's views on labor law are outside the historical mainstream. Sen. John McCain (R-Az.) described Becker's appointment as "clear payback by the Administration to organized labor." </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">778f5b5a-f513-4a48-a8e5-3f82c2aae744</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New FTC Guidelines Require Employers To Strengthen Social Networking Policies</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-FTC-Guidelines-Require-Employers-To-Strengthen-Social-Networking-Policies</link>
      <description>The revised guidelines on endorsements and testimonials in advertising, codified at 16 C.F.R. § 255, threaten liability under the Federal Trade Commission Act for both employees and employers if an employee fails to clearly and conspicuously disclose the employer/employee relationship when touting a product or service of the employer, including on a blog, online messaging board, or other social networking platform like Facebook or MySpace. These guidelines target "deceptive" advertising by employees whose endorsements are affected by the "material connections" that exist with their employers but who fail to disclose that such relationships exist.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f1838219-023b-405e-bb58-3eec7afe7186</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Congress Limits Arbitration of Employment Disputes by Defense Contractors and Subcontractors</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Congress-Limits-Arbitration-of-Employment-Disputes-by-Defense-Contractors-and-Subcontractors</link>
      <description>On December 22, President Obama signed into law the 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 3326). The spending bill includes a significant amendment, offered by Senator Al Franken of Minnesota, prohibiting certain government contractors from entering into or enforcing arbitration clauses in employment agreements. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1dec9bcc-1f5e-4072-81fb-94e5e3f592ed</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>COBRA Subsidy Extended, New Notice Requirements Imposed</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/COBRA-Subsidy-Extended-New-Notice-Requirements-Imposed</link>
      <description>As discussed in our February 18, 2009 Special Employee Benefits Alert as well as our October 16, 2009 Employee Benefits Update, the Stimulus Bill, also known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA"), provides a temporary COBRA subsidy intended to help unemployed workers and their families afford continuation health coverage. Under the ARRA, this COBRA subsidy (i.e., federal subsidization of 65% of the applicable COBRA premium) lasted for 9 months of COBRA coverage and was available to employees who were involuntarily terminated anytime between September 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009. In light of both the persistently high unemployment rates and the rapidly approaching closing of the window for eligibility for this subsidy, Congress enacted and, on December 21, 2009, President Obama signed into law, an extension of the COBRA subsidy. The extension appears as part of the Fiscal Year 2010 Defense Appropriations Act ("DAA") and is ...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e99b205a-23cd-42cd-b0bc-536227856b49</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Court Grant of Motion for Summary Judgment to Employer Emphasizes Importance of Prompt Remedial Action in Response to Harassment Complaints</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Federal-Court-Grant-of-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-to-Employer-Emphasizes-Importance-of-Prompt-Remedial-Action-in-Response-to-Harassment-Complaints</link>
      <description>A recent case before the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland emphasizes the importance of employers' prompt remedial actions in addressing complaints of co-worker harassment.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">03a2855e-9474-428d-82c2-718ac8f8e0f5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New York State Department of Labor Issues Forms Required When Giving Notice to New Employees Concerning Compensation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-York-State-Department-of-Labor-Issues-Forms-Required-When-Giving-Notice-to-New-Employees-Concerning-Compensation</link>
      <description>As previously reported in our October 27, 2009 Client Alert, New York Labor Law Section 195(1) was amended, as of October 26, 2009, to require employers in the State of New York to provide newly hired employees, upon their date of hire, with written notification of their regular rate of pay, overtime rate of pay (if applicable) and regular pay dates. Employers are further required to obtain from each employee a written acknowledgement of their receipt of such notice.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17038326-04a0-4786-8eb7-d5c6683a6d24</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New York Employers Must Comply With New Notice Requirements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/New-York-Employers-Must-Comply-With-New-Notice-Requirements</link>
      <description>Starting October 26, 2009, employers in New York must provide newly-hired employees with written notification of their regular rate of pay, overtime rate of pay, if applicable, and the employer's regular pay dates upon their date of hire. Employers are further required to obtain a written acknowledgement from each employee that he or she has received the required notice. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36304601-b54d-4717-aa56-8598a229a9dc</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Employee Benefits Update</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Employee-Benefits-Update-1352329</link>
      <description>While so much of the national focus has been on the pending healthcare reform legislation being discussed in Congress and by President Obama, other important developments in the employee benefits field have recently occurred or are likely to occur in the near term. All three branches of the Government are involved, with the actions of executive agencies and the legislative branch often being intertwined. These developments occupy six distinct areas of continuing concern in the employee benefits field: (1) executive branch initiatives to increase and protect retirement savings; (2) Supreme Court cases involving plan administration and compensation issues; (3) proposals to limit executive compensation; (4) mental health parity regulations; (5) continuing efforts by Congress and the Department of Labor (“DOL”) to require disclosure of fees paid by plans; and (6) further federal and state actions regarding COBRA subsidies. These matters, described in detail below, bear close attention because they will ...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">61805aea-9a9a-44a7-974b-ef8a8ad05196</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>DOL Issues Proposed Rule Implementing Executive Order 13496 - Notice of NLRA Rights </title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/DOL-Issues-Proposed-Rule-Implementing-Executive-Order-13496-Notice-of-NLRA-Rights</link>
      <description>Federal contractors and subcontractors covered by President Obama's Executive Order 13496, Notification of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws, will soon be required to post new, lengthy notices of their employees' rights under federal labor law. The U.S. Department of Labor ("DOL") issued its Proposed Rule implementing this Obama Executive Order on August 3, 2009. Notable provisions of the Proposed Rule include the following:  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cc81084e-c6d1-47df-8683-ec07c575cd34</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Minimum Wage Increases Federally And In 16 Jurisdictions</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Labor-Employment-Law-Alert-US/Minimum-Wage-Increases-Federally-And-In-16-Jurisdictions</link>
      <description>Effective Friday, July 24, 2009, the federal minimum wage will increase again to $7.25 per hour for all those employees covered under the minimum wage requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended ("FLSA").  </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>