<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:04:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <title>
    </title>
    <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0658388f-b0b4-4b3d-876e-482ee4a7e36d</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:30:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>ITC Rules for Samsung; Bans Imports and Sales of Older Models of Apple's iPhone and iPad</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/ITC-Rules-for-Samsung-Bans-Imports-and-Sales-of-Older-Models-of-Apples-iPhone-and-iPad</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a906e16d-21fd-4565-a02a-b288f5fe4429</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 10:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Texas Adopts Version of Uniform Trade Secrets Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Texas-Adopts-Version-of-Uniform-Trade-Secrets-Act</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9a7b673b-ac2c-42df-afd8-fe9b3e745948</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>U.S.P.T.O. Modifies Program for Consideration of Responses Submitted to Final Office Actions</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/USPTO-Modifies-Program-for-Consideration-of-Responses-Submitted-to-Final-Office-Actions</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">634ea639-c336-4a56-a692-e095148cc302</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:10:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Much-Anticipated Decision On Rates To License Standard Essential Patents Issues</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Much-Anticipated-Decision-On-Rates-To-License-Standard-Essential-Patents-Issues</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bf48fb90-35b4-4ed2-bec0-641bcbb393dc</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:15:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Companies May Begin to Protect Their Online Presence Anew: Trademark Clearinghouse Now Available For New gTLDs</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Companies-May-Begin-to-Protect-Their-Online-Presence-Anew-Trademark-Clearinghouse-Now-Available-For-New-gTLDs</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46cbd059-0c53-4c3b-aafa-79a1ce5d6dee</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:23:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>ICANN Publishes the URS Rules and an Updated Version of the URS Procedure</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/ICANN-Publishes-the-URS-Rules-and-an-Updated-Version-of-the-URS-Procedure</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1758339c-4fa2-42ba-aec4-2fc980ca1167</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New Legislation Seeks to Shift Legal Fees to Unsuccessful Nonpracticing Entities</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/New-Legislation-Seeks-to-Shift-Legal-Fees-to-Unsuccessful-Nonpracticing-Entities</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a70a7581-0b83-4e54-a628-98d25ed8266d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>First Ever RICO Claim Against NPE Dismissed, But Other Claims Including RAND Commitments Remain Viable</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/First-Ever-RICO-Claim-Against-NPEs-Dismissed-But-Other-Claims-Including-RAND-Commitments-Remain-Viable</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17001563-2fa4-4ed8-9ab1-4658bd2d58ef</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The White House Shines a Spotlight on Trade Secret Theft</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/The-White-House-Shines-a-Spotlight-on-Trade-Secret-Theft</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">225c56b9-db52-4231-b3ee-03b3f8899a64</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:25:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Congress Increases Criminal Penalties for Trade Secrets Theft</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Congress-Increases-Criminal-Penalties-for-Trade-Secrets-Theft</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b9be291d-a6ff-41ab-97de-4a6c9d5c31b6</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:43:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Court Dismisses Patent Troll Attack on Patent Aggregator RPX (For Now)</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Court-Dismisses-Patent-Troll-Attack-on-Patent-Aggregator-RPX-For-Now</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88356bbe-d2ae-4d92-a823-2ca378859ebf</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:51:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Second Circuit Holds That Employee's Misuse of Information on a Computer Server Alone Satisfies Minimum Contacts Test for Personal Jurisdiction in That State</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Second-Circuit-Holds-That-Employees-Misuse-of-Information-on-a-Computer-Server-Alone-Satisfies-Minimum-Contacts-Test-for-Personal-Jurisdiction-in-That-State</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f9e28ea8-2b8e-4fae-8e17-e0916bb45bfc</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:19:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Court Recognizes Narrowly Drawn CFAA Claim Against Traffickers of Access Credentials</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/California-Court-Recognizes-Narrowly-Drawn-CFAA-Claim-Against-Traffickers-of-Access-Credentials</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ffec3b84-fc82-447f-b28b-730f360b23e4</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:04:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit Clarifies the ITC's Domestic Industry Requirement for Licensing Activities, Opening Door for More NPE Filings</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Circuit-Clarifies-the-ITCs-Domestic-Industry-Requirement-for-Licensing-Activities-Opening-Door-for-More-NPE-Filings</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9e9eab9a-eb01-4036-a97b-53c3b31693cc</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Settles with Google on Standard-Essential Patents</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/FTC-Settles-with-Google-on-Standard-Essential-Patents</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b4f01793-956f-491e-b47e-386ab6ee3307</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Congress Broadens Federal Criminal Trade Secrets Statute</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Congress-Broadens-Federal-Criminal-Trade-Secrets-Statute</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a8d1c363-cbb1-4ad7-a2d7-83c4f2edf46d</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Continues Campaign Against Injunctions for Standard Essential Patents: Uses Section 5 to Push Section 2 Boundaries</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/FTC-Continues-Campaign-Against-Injunctions-for-Standard-Essential-Patents-Uses-Section-5-to-Push-Section-2-Boundaries</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b7433533-e630-4b14-bda1-f9112f5781e9</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The Latest Attempt to Federalize Trade Secret Law</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/The-Latest-Attempt-to-Federalize-Trade-Secret-Law-1375781</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9aae4815-c651-44aa-9bb0-f43ed37af45a</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Patent Law Alert:  An Invention is Patentable Unless it is Not "Manifestly Evident" That the Invention is an Abstract Idea</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Patent-Law-Alert-An-Invention-is-Patentable-Unless-it-is-Not-Manifestly-Evident-That-the-Invention-is-an-Abstract-Idea</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3807293a-ef18-4b47-8714-7b2780f71f18</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Patent Law Alert: Pre-Suit Licenses Cannot Block Challenges to Patent Validity</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Patent-Law-Alert-Pre-Suit-Licenses-Cannot-Block-Challenges-to-Patent-Validity</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">89a9912a-0abd-42ef-bd64-cf135a9cef4a</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:23:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>ITC Proposes Comprehensive Changes to its Rules of Practice and Procedure</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/ITC-Proposes-Comprehensive-Changes-to-its-Rules-of-Practice-and-Procedure</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fdbe7bc6-45b6-46b9-8c16-319a396c2c44</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:32:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Sunbeam: Seventh Circuit Says That Rejection in Bankruptcy Does Not Vaporize a Trademark Licensee's Rights</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Sunbeam-Seventh-Circuit-Says-That-Rejection-in-Bankruptcy-Does-Not-Vaporize-a-Trademark-Licensees-Rights</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20453076-990a-47aa-92c1-64fd66a8d921</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Patent Law Alert: Willful Infringement Requires a Threshold Judicial (Not a Jury) Finding of Objective Recklessness</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Patent-Law-Alert-Willful-Infringement-Requires-a-Threshold-Judicial-Not-a-Jury-Finding-of-Objective-Recklessness</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">385baeda-410a-435f-8790-a17bb18619d5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Urges ITC to Deny Exclusion Orders for RAND-Encumbered Standard Essential Patent Holders</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/FTC-Urges-ITC-to-Deny-Exclusion-Orders-for-RAND-Encumbered-Standard-Essential-Patent-Holders</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7dd4210-aff9-4492-840b-9329886727f0</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:57:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit Rejects Common Sense Approach to Obviousness</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Circuit-Rejects-Common-Sense-Approach-to-Obviousness</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">049870e1-9d8b-4bb8-85be-da2c6842208f</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:40:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit Holds That Settlement Negotiations Are Not Privileged</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Circuit-Holds-That-Settlement-Negotiations-Are-Not-Privileged</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c369c3f9-ca3b-4ac7-b266-e8c5ca1bab4a</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:46:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>DOJ Prosecution of Chinese State-Owned Enterprise for Trade Secrets Theft Offers Lessons for U.S. Businesses</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/DOJ-Prosecution-of-Chinese-State-Owned-Enterprise-for-Trade-Secrets-Theft-Offers-Lessons-for-US-Businesses</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50cda38a-90f1-47f4-bafd-73d74453ab85</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:02:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New Jersey Adopts the Uniform Trade Secrets Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/New-Jersey-Adopts-the-Uniform-Trade-Secrets-Act</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c1b34b5c-3d6d-44de-b484-37ef4a7a7cc2</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Circuit Court Reinforces That Neither Lack Of Novelty Nor Ability To Reverse Engineer Are Defenses To Trade Secret Misappropriation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Circuit-Court-Reinforces-That-Neither-Lack-Of-Novelty-Nor-Ability-To-Reverse-Engineer-Are-Defenses-To-Trade-Secret-Misappropriation</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24a6747c-4702-41b0-a6cf-d5ea1cdfadc8</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Crowell &amp; Moring's Top Ten Copyright Cases of the Last Year</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Crowell-Morings-Top-Ten-Copyright-Cases-of-the-Last-Year-1367160</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db726e5d-144d-46c2-b18f-252d152444de</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:03:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The ITC Can Play A Critical Role In Combating International Trade Secret Theft</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/The-ITC-Can-Play-A-Critical-Role-In-Combating-International-Trade-Secret-Theft</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bdf8e66e-14b6-4c63-9613-cebfd0fbbe99</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:00:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>What You Should Know About U.S. Copyright Office’s New White Paper on Mass Digitization of Copyrighted Works</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/What-You-Should-Know-About-US-Copyright-Office-s-New-White-Paper-on-Mass-Digitization-of-Copyrighted-Works</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2ed6336-2cc8-4a6e-a6db-4a5df740fb0a</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Sweeping U.S. Patent Law Changes - America Invents Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Sweeping-US-Patent-Law-Changes-America-Invents-Act</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">447c1f56-a176-48f7-b163-f4304762d940</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:51:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>District Court Carves Out "Trade Secret Exception" to California Ban on Enforcement of Non-Compete Agreements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/District-Court-Carves-Out-Trade-Secret-Exception-to-California-Ban-on-Enforcement-of-Non-Compete-Agreements</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2222b30a-7b1b-4dc8-aa78-e6ada38dd8f2</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Texas Supreme Court Expands Scope of Enforceable Non-Competes</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Texas-Supreme-Court-Expands-Scope-of-Enforceable-Non-Competes</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50350fda-0d94-46d4-864a-36c48184d4ce</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:01:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Hosts Workshop on Intellectual Property Rights In Standard Setting: Tools to Prevent Patent Hold-Up</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/FTC-Hosts-Workshop-on-Intellectual-Property-Rights-In-Standard-Setting-Tools-to-Prevent-Patent-Hold-Up</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">72c01e0b-c09e-40a5-ae52-103b9a2cdf3e</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Trade Secret Misappropriation and Non-Competes Across (California) State Lines: What Law Governs?</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Trade-Secret-Misappropriation-and-Non-Competes-Across-California-State-Lines-What-Law-Governs</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19a35256-5121-4398-87aa-f0e60fa35e93</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>USPTO Announces Prioritized Examination for One Year Prosecution Available May 4th</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/USPTO-Announces-Prioritized-Examination-for-One-Year-Prosecution-Available-May-4th</link>
      <description>Today the United States Patent and Trademark Office (U.S.P.T.O.) announced a final rule implementing a prioritized examination track with a goal of providing a final disposition of an application within 12 months of prioritized status being granted. A request for prioritized examination may be submitted with any original non-provisional application filed on or after May 4, 2011. 

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">84442c9b-8b0c-460a-bc59-f9744267f80d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Crowell &amp; Moring's Top Ten Copyright Cases of the Last Year</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Crowell-Morings-Top-Ten-Copyright-Cases-of-the-Last-Year</link>
      <description>What are the trends that will impact copyright owners in 2011? To answer that question, we start by taking a look at what we believe are the top 10 most significant copyright cases from 2010. Understanding the drivers behind these mega cases, which include two Supreme Court decisions, will be crucial to devising your IP strategy for the coming year.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">edf5ee94-ada4-4fe8-8484-1b019e561377</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Retailers With Websites Containing Store Locator Function Sued In Series of Patent Lawsuits</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Retailers-With-Websites-Containing-Store-Locator-Function-Sued-In-Series-of-Patent-Lawsuits</link>
      <description>The last two weeks of 2010 witnessed the launching of what may be the largest patent infringement litigation in the United States. Between December 17, 2010 and December 23, 2010, a "patent troll," Geotag, Inc., filed eight patent infringement lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, each of which alleged infringement of a single patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,930,474 (the "'474 Patent"), against different groups of defendants. The principal targets of these lawsuits were retailers with websites containing a store locator function. More than 300 companies were named in the lawsuits.

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47459585-dab7-4857-a9d3-3ed8e7344c62</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit's En Banc Princo Decision Limits Patent Misuse Doctrine</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Circuits-En-Banc-Princo-Decision-Limits-Patent-Misuse-Doctrine</link>
      <description>On August 30, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an en-banc decision affirming the International Trade Commission's ("ITC") holding that the "patent misuse" doctrine did not prevent U.S. Philips Corporation ("Philips") from enforcing its patent rights against Princo Corporation and Princo America Corporation (collectively "Princo").  The court's decision, Princo Corp. v. International Trade Comm'n, No. 2007-1386 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 30, 2010) confirms the narrow scope of the patent misuse doctrine, and underscores the broad protection afforded patent holders when licensing their patents.  The case also highlights the challenges that can arise when reconciling intellectual property and antitrust law.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2daec3e-42dd-4c4a-88a9-5591e8ecc947</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Settles Charges That Intel Violated Section 5 of the FTC Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/FTC-Settles-Charges-That-Intel-Violated-Section-5-of-the-FTC-Act</link>
      <description>On August 4, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission approved a proposed consent order with Intel. This settlement resolved FTC allegations that Intel violated Section 5 of the FTC Act when it used de facto exclusive dealing arrangements and market share deals to induce original equipment manufacturers to forgo purchasing non-Intel central processing units ("CPUs") and graphics processing units ("GPUs"). The FTC complaint also alleged that Intel engaged in predatory engineering practices to exclude competitors. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b4b34de-2e0b-4ac9-93d0-e9bbf7a66b48</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court's Bilski Decision:  Business Method Patents Survive, at Least for Now</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Supreme-Courts-Bilski-Decision-Business-Method-Patents-Survive-at-Least-for-Now</link>
      <description>The United States Supreme Court yesterday issued its long-awaited decision in Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. ___ (2010). Although this case was expected to be a vehicle for a definitive pronouncement on the patentability of so-called "business methods," the Supreme Court decided the case on much narrower grounds, leaving the broader question unanswered. Specifically, the Supreme Court agreed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the particular invention at issue, directed to a method for managing risk in commodities markets, was unpatentable.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c1200f6-5d6d-4c6d-aeb7-23a5a314de82</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Second Circuit Wants Full Court Review of Reverse Exclusionary Settlement Payments</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Second-Circuit-Wants-Full-Court-Review-of-Reverse-Exclusionary-Settlement-Payments</link>
      <description>A Second Circuit panel has invited an en banc or full court review of a "reverse exclusionary settlement payments" case that may ultimately reach the Supreme Court. The case is Arkansas Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund v. Bayer A.G., Nos. 05-2851-cv(L) and 05-2852-cv(CON) (2d. Cir. Apr. 29, 2010).  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca7daa42-daf7-4598-8f09-099e27741eb8</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Trade Commission Charges Intel With Anticompetitive Conduct; Commits to Expedited Administrative Trial and Decision</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Trade-Commission-Charges-Intel-With-Anticompetitive-Conduct-Commits-to-Expedited-Administrative-Trial-and-Decision</link>
      <description>After years of investigation, the FTC today joined the governmental attack on Intel's market position and behavior in microprocessors. The administrative complaint announced today alleges that Intel engaged in a "course of conduct" designed to preserve its x86 microprocessor monopoly position against technology advances by both AMD and Via Technologies as well as by producers of graphics microprocessors such as Nvidia. The anticompetitive conduct is alleged to include 1) making misleading statements about the market-readiness of Intel's own products, 2) offering coercive bundled pricing and tying of Intel's products resulting in below cost pricing, and 3) specifically designing Intel compiler software to degrade the performance of non-Intel chips running the software.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1cfebe4e-8adb-4785-8d60-e91a10163b20</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Closes Qualcomm Investigation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/European-Commission-Closes-Qualcomm-Investigation</link>
      <description>Today, the European Commission announced that it closed its investigation into Qualcomm’s licensing practices of 3G mobile technology patents.  In October 2007, the Commission initiated formal proceedings against Qualcomm Inc., a US chipset manufacturer and holder of IP rights in the CDMA and WCDMA standards for mobile telephony, regarding an alleged infringement of Article 82 EC (which forbids abuse of dominant position).  The Commission initiated this investigation following complaints by mobile phone and chipset manufacturers Nokia, Ericsson, Broadcom, Texas Instruments, Panasonic and NEC.  The WCDMA standard forms part of the 3G (third generation) standard for European mobile phone technology (also referred to as “UMTS”). The complaints alleged that Qualcomm’s licensing practices breached Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (“FRAND”) standards and therefore breached EC competition rules.  The complaints also alleged that charging non-FRAND royalties would lead to higher handset prices, a slower development of the 3G standard, and ...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e290f8b-b15a-427d-b136-5c2f0297b161</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Publishes Final Report in Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry and Opens Formal Proceedings against Patent Settlements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/European-Commission-Publishes-Final-Report-in-Pharmaceutical-Sector-Inquiry-and-Opens-Formal-Proceedings-against-Patent-Settlements</link>
      <description>The European Commission today published the final report in its Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry. The Commission's findings remain largely unchanged from those in the interim report published in November last year. However, the language of the final report is less overtly critical of originator companies and the Commission's focus appears to have shifted away from the pursuit of individual antitrust cases and towards changes to the regulatory framework governing pharmaceutical markets. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9f082cff-1299-4550-bc40-4465f8eec551</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Protecting Your Trademark on Facebook</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Protecting-Your-Trademark-on-Facebook</link>
      <description>Facebook®, the popular social networking system, has announced that starting at 12:01 a.m. (EDT) on Saturday, June 13, 2009, its users will be allowed to create personalized URLs. (see http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=90316352130). This raises the possibility that some Facebook users may try to incorporate third party trademarks as part of their new URLs. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e29148b-5979-404b-9cda-1cdae6ef002d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission imposes record € 1.06 billion antitrust fine on Intel</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/European-Commission-imposes-record-106-billion-antitrust-fine-on-Intel</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aa7c956d-32b8-471d-8fb0-08c49964db18</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit Affirms Extension of The 30 Month Hatch-Waxman Stay Preventing FDA Approval of Generic Version of Evista</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Circuit-Affirms-Extension-of-The-30-Month-Hatch-Waxman-Stay-Preventing-FDA-Approval-of-Generic-Version-of-Evista</link>
      <description>For the first time, the Federal Circuit has affirmed the extension of a thirty month stay under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (known as the "Hatch-Waxman Act"). The U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana extended the stay because the generic company recast its product, disclosing new samples only eight months before trial was to commence and produced documents after the discovery cut-off. But a vigorous dissent claims that what the majority had done is to "effectively eliminate the statutorily required finding." </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">97a54369-ccc9-4e3a-8fc1-d08d617e7542</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Patent Application Process Must Be Compliant with U.S. Export Controls</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Patent-Application-Process-Must-Be-Compliant-with-US-Export-Controls-1352006</link>
      <description>Commerce Reinforces the Need for Export Compliance in Patent Transactions. The Department of Commerce – through the U.S. Patent &amp; Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) – is reaching out to patent applicants and practitioners in several ways to ensure compliance with U.S. export control obligations relevant in the patent context. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5047ed71-f918-43f3-9469-93f4ec77e573</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Supreme Court Leaves Intact Broad Prohibitions On Enforceability Of Non-compete Agreements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/California-Supreme-Court-Leaves-Intact-Broad-Prohibitions-On-Enforceability-Of-Non-compete-Agreements</link>
      <description>On August 7, 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Edwards v. Arthur Andersen, LLP, putting to rest the question of whether limited or so-called "narrow-restraint" employee non-compete agreements were permissible under California law. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e93b6e35-ffc9-4c8c-a2a9-42d317e41670</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Judge Upholds Smithkline's Challenge To USPTO Continuation Rules</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Judge-Upholds-Smithklines-Challenge-To-USPTO-Continuation-Rules</link>
      <description>The US District Court in Alexandria, Virginia today issued an opinion rejecting the PTO's proposed rules (issued last year) that would have limited the filing of continuation applications, as well as the number of claims per application. This result, while not unexpected, at least removes the immediate threat that these draconian measures could have become effective in the near term. It will now be up to the PTO to decide whether it will appeal this decision to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, issue new proposed rules, or give up the idea altogether.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">993ea75a-a2dd-461f-8cd4-9f8aafb4bc35</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New TTAB Rules Go Into Effect November 1</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/New-TTAB-Rules-Go-Into-Effect-November-1</link>
      <description>Significant new rules applicable in Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings will go into effect on November 1, 2007. These include a number of new rules governing the parties' conduct at the very early stages of the proceeding.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a715e47-b51f-42ce-a232-7b8568182c72</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit Raises the Bar for Proving Willful Infringement, and Provides for Protection of Trial Counsel Communications and Work Product From Discovery -- Great News for Accused Infringers</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Circuit-Raises-the-Bar-for-Proving-Willful-Infringement-and-Provides-for-Protection-of-Trial-Counsel-Communications-and-Work-Product-From-Discovery-Great-News-for-Accused-Infringers</link>
      <description>The threat of treble damages against defendants based on allegations of willful infringement has been reduced. Based on the recent unanimous en banc decision of the Federal Circuit, only objectively reckless behavior by a defendant may warrant a finding of willful infringement. Additionally, the Court held that the scope of waiver of privilege resulting from an 'opinion of counsel' defense against willfulness charges does not ordinarily extend to trial counsel, which should provide further assurance to defendants that typically segregate opinion and trial counsel. In re Seagate, No. M830 (Fed. Cir., Aug. 20, 2007).  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30bb3454-199f-4f13-9e4c-ddee5f15a9f5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Controversial New Continuation And Examination Support Document Rules Are Effective November 1, 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Controversial-New-Continuation-And-Examination-Support-Document-Rules-Are-Effective-November-1-2007</link>
      <description>Yesterday, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“the Office”) issued its much-awaited final rules involving continuing applications, requests for continued examination and the numbers of claims to be examined. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">de031cdc-9bbd-4de8-afdb-1961389f0fea</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Post-KSR Patent Prosecution “Survival Guide”</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Post-KSR-Patent-Prosecution-Survival-Guide</link>
      <description>In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR International v. Teleflex, US patent applicants are likely to encounter a surge of obviousness rejections from the USPTO. Undoubtedly, KSR has dramatically altered the patent prosecution landscape: some arguments that might have prevailed prior to KSR may no longer be viable. In this alert, we first summarize the KSR decision, and then predict the top arguments for combating post-KSR obviousness rejections before the USPTO. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">054d4098-e541-4ec6-b5ad-026275148fd6</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>US Supreme Court Makes it Easier to Find Patents Obvious</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/US-Supreme-Court-Makes-it-Easier-to-Find-Patents-Obvious</link>
      <description>In a much-anticipated decision, KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, overruled the Federal Circuit’s longstanding test for determining when an invention is "obvious" under the patent statute.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b96e97b6-cc72-4f0a-9fce-616de11107d9</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>MedImmune's Impact May Be Greater Than Many Suspect</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/MedImmunes-Impact-May-Be-Greater-Than-Many-Suspect</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ced22135-e06d-4424-96e4-fc1774af693f</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court Signals Shift in Obviousness Standard</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Supreme-Court-Signals-Shift-in-Obviousness-Standard</link>
      <description>A recent oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court may be signaling a shift in the patent landscape towards increased difficulty in obtaining patents and more frequent invalidity findings in court actions.  </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>