<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:10:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <title>
    </title>
    <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">634ea639-c336-4a56-a692-e095148cc302</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:10:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Much-Anticipated Decision On Rates To License Standard Essential Patents Issues</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Much-Anticipated-Decision-On-Rates-To-License-Standard-Essential-Patents-Issues</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2aa2068a-98d4-4b1c-b1f7-7f9eb6eefce1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Antitrust Developments - Dec. 2012 to Mar. 2013</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Antitrust-Developments-Dec-2012-to-Mar-2013</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14adb5c8-477d-4373-9d25-684523ab02dc</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:25:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Review of Competition Law Fines by German Courts - Differences to the  Review by European Courts?</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Review-of-Competition-Law-Fines-by-German-Courts-Differences-to-the-Review-by-European-Courts</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3468dc7d-b7a8-495b-9544-7c20cbf07797</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court Raises the Bar for Class Action Suits by Requiring Plaintiffs to Show a Specific Calculation of Damages for the Specific Theory of Harm for which a Class is Certified</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Supreme-Court-Raises-the-Bar-for-Class-Action-Suits-by-Requiring-Plaintiffs-to-Show-a-Specific-Calculation-of-Damages-for-the-Specific-Theory-of-Harm-for-which-a-Class-is-Certified</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a70a7581-0b83-4e54-a628-98d25ed8266d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>First Ever RICO Claim Against NPE Dismissed, But Other Claims Including RAND Commitments Remain Viable</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/First-Ever-RICO-Claim-Against-NPEs-Dismissed-But-Other-Claims-Including-RAND-Commitments-Remain-Viable</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b9be291d-a6ff-41ab-97de-4a6c9d5c31b6</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:43:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Court Dismisses Patent Troll Attack on Patent Aggregator RPX (For Now)</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Court-Dismisses-Patent-Troll-Attack-on-Patent-Aggregator-RPX-For-Now</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dd57ecad-834a-4415-afd2-d4bf7d5525aa</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:33:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Announces New HSR and Section 8 Thresholds</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Announces-New-HSR-and-Section-8-Thresholds</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9e9eab9a-eb01-4036-a97b-53c3b31693cc</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Settles with Google on Standard-Essential Patents</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Settles-with-Google-on-Standard-Essential-Patents</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a8d1c363-cbb1-4ad7-a2d7-83c4f2edf46d</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Continues Campaign Against Injunctions for Standard Essential Patents: Uses Section 5 to Push Section 2 Boundaries</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Continues-Campaign-Against-Injunctions-for-Standard-Essential-Patents-Uses-Section-5-to-Push-Section-2-Boundaries</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a0384aa-5ee0-401d-92d3-0ecaecdf4267</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:24:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Finalizes Changes to Rules Governing Investigatory Procedures, Primarily to Address Issues Regarding Electronically Stored Information</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Finalizes-Changes-to-Rules-Governing-Investigatory-Procedures-Primarily-to-Address-Issues-Regarding-Electronically-Stored-Information</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">86d5108b-4503-4d32-b204-8f92dbcc2194</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Clarifies "Investment Only" Exception to HSR Reportability</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Clarifies-Investment-Only-Exception-to-HSR-Reportability</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9da4832f-ac24-4733-9da2-192b2149ffc9</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:25:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Merger Control in the Americas: Increased Convergence or Increased Scrutiny?</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Merger-Control-in-the-Americas-Increased-Convergence-or-Increased-Scrutiny</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">694bd4b6-1143-4bfa-8cc1-f08d71509e0b</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Seventh Circuit Makes it Easier for Antitrust Plaintiffs to Pursue Their Claims Against Overseas Cartels</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Seventh-Circuit-Makes-it-Easier-for-Antitrust-Plaintiffs-to-Pursue-Their-Claims-Against-Overseas-Cartels</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">385baeda-410a-435f-8790-a17bb18619d5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Urges ITC to Deny Exclusion Orders for RAND-Encumbered Standard Essential Patent Holders</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Urges-ITC-to-Deny-Exclusion-Orders-for-RAND-Encumbered-Standard-Essential-Patent-Holders</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6af83d7f-1e3b-4844-8aa4-3bba2394e809</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:07:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>"Toto – We Can't Be In Kansas": Kansas Supreme Court Scuttles Rule of Reason for Resale Price Agreements Under State Law</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Toto-We-Cant-Be-In-Kansas-Kansas-Supreme-Court-Scuttles-Rule-of-Reason-for-Resale-Price-Agreements-Under-State-Law</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ef02e440-1863-4cbc-a6e9-03d2161f9d0d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 10:19:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Eighth Circuit Approves Use of Fraud Guidelines for Antitrust Crimes</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Eighth-Circuit-Approves-Use-of-Fraud-Guidelines-for-Antitrust-Crimes</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41d034a5-0bc0-4f33-b5e9-e063ad7c0aa0</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:07:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Bundeskartellamt and Public Prosecutors Jointly Focusing on the Prosecution of Bid Rigging</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Bundeskartellamt-and-Public-Prosecutors-Jointly-Focusing-on-the-Prosecution-of-Bid-Rigging</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">777c6dd8-d8cc-40ac-ac02-49d40c6bd8af</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:13:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Second Circuit Weighs in Again on Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Second-Circuit-Weighs-in-Again-on-Class-Action-Waivers-in-Arbitration-Agreements</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3a408081-c2ad-41df-a8d6-5fc775269f56</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Proposes Changes to Rules Governing Investigatory Procedures, Primarily to Address Issues Regarding Electronically Stored Information</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Proposes-Changes-to-Rules-Governing-Investigatory-Procedures-Primarily-to-Address-Issues-Regarding-Electronically-Stored-Information</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f52cfecf-8416-4a9f-8d06-25b031845d54</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Increases HSR and Section 8 Thresholds</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Increases-HSR-and-Section-8-Thresholds</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">efa5cfc5-2d40-40d5-b810-fac74e5d11c0</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>General Court Confirms Commission Decision Not To Investigate Cartridge Market For Ink Jet Printers</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/General-Court-Confirms-Commission-Decision-Not-To-Investigate-Cartridge-Market-For-Ink-Jet-Printers</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4a9f56c7-c206-471e-bae0-ee5dad44ba6c</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:49:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Gives High-Level Guidance on Antitrust Compliance</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-Gives-High-Level-Guidance-on-Antitrust-Compliance</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c5bc31ef-f6f8-4d86-9817-4344f44fc269</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:32:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>German Constitutional Court Declines to Rule on National Legislation Strictly Implementing European Law</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/German-Constitutional-Court-Declines-to-Rule-on-National-Legislation-Strictly-Implementing-European-Law</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8990bcb3-bbc7-41f3-837b-1f3bc77dd692</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:58:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Court of Justice Further Supports Internet Sales</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Court-of-Justice-Further-Supports-Internet-Sales</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26052b65-7530-4d5f-aa2b-0d424352b10c</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Mandatory Indian Merger Control: What You Need to Know</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Mandatory-Indian-Merger-Control-What-You-Need-to-Know</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c110295d-cb1c-48a8-8e9a-8a472974eab4</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Requires More Documents With Revised HSR Notification Form</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Requires-More-Documents-With-Revised-HSR-Notification-Form</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50350fda-0d94-46d4-864a-36c48184d4ce</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:01:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Hosts Workshop on Intellectual Property Rights In Standard Setting: Tools to Prevent Patent Hold-Up</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Hosts-Workshop-on-Intellectual-Property-Rights-In-Standard-Setting-Tools-to-Prevent-Patent-Hold-Up</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">affa71f7-0344-4ea4-b6b9-2e643e5b61c3</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:20:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Hidden Discount Judgment of $2 Billion Against Ford: Implications for Pricing Systems</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Hidden-Discount-Judgment-of-2-Billion-Against-Ford-Implications-for-Pricing-Systems</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">af2a64bc-7347-4275-a6d6-d8a40bf0fc54</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Antitrust Division Issues Updated Policy Guide to Merger Remedies</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Antitrust-Division-Issues-Updated-Policy-Guide-to-Merger-Remedies</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a554291a-e8fb-4a01-bf65-e79d7338ca31</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>OFT Investigates Possible RPM in Relation to E-books</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/OFT-Investigates-Possible-RPM-in-Relation-to-E-books</link>
      <description>The OFT has confirmed that it is investigating the pricing of e-books in the UK following "a significant number of complaints".  Targets of the investigation appear to include Pearson and Lagadère.

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df261f28-e90e-42d1-8ced-f3935a4b3fab</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Robust State Enforcement of Minimum Resale Price Maintenance May Require New Approaches to Pricing</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Robust-State-Enforcement-of-Minimum-Resale-Price-Maintenance-May-Require-New-Approaches-to-Pricing</link>
      <description>Two recent state enforcement actions that relied solely on state law to attack minimum resale price maintenance ("RPM") provide the latest indication that states are diverging from federal antitrust law in their increasingly strong efforts to police RPM agreements in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007).  

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">848143ab-ebc4-48c7-be0c-cacf0c5fb355</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Announces Increased HSR and Section 8 Thresholds</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Announces-Increased-HSR-and-Section-8-Thresholds</link>
      <description>As further evidence that the U.S. economy has begun to turn the corner, the Federal Trade Commission announced today that it would increase the jurisdictional thresholds applicable to both the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act") and Section 8 of the Clayton Act. These dollar thresholds are indexed annually based on changes in the U.S. gross national product.

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8497fbf9-aa75-40a1-a746-903eafa02b93</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Fine of € 38 million (US$ 51 million) for Procedural Breach during a 'Dawn Raid' upheld by EU Court</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Fine-of-38-million-US-51-million-for-Procedural-Breach-during-a-Dawn-Raid-upheld-by-EU-Court</link>
      <description>Today, December 15, 2010, the EU's General Court upheld the European Commission's decision to impose a € 38 million fine on the Germany energy company E.ON for breaching a seal during an antitrust dawn raid. 

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c11c659b-f23c-4e5b-b366-b3fac3329548</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Adopts New Antitrust Guidelines On Cooperation Between Competitors</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-Adopts-New-Antitrust-Guidelines-On-Cooperation-Between-Competitors</link>
      <description>Today, December 14, 2010, the European Commission has adopted revised guidelines on the treatment of cooperation between competitors under EU antitrust rules. The main changes from previous Commission guidance concern standardization, information exchange and the treatment of joint ventures. The guidelines also cover joint R&amp;D, production, distribution and purchasing.

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3784bd1-bdd0-4e1d-9841-7393904c1074</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California's Predatory Pricing Law Differs From Federal Counterpart</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Californias-Predatory-Pricing-Law-Differs-From-Federal-Counterpart</link>
      <description>The California Supreme Court has let stand an appellate court ruling that allows for broad interpretation of California state predatory pricing law. Significantly, the case holds that proof of recoupment is not required to prevail in predatory pricing cases. This broad interpretation means that it will be easier to bring predatory pricing cases against California retailers and merchants.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47459585-dab7-4857-a9d3-3ed8e7344c62</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit's En Banc Princo Decision Limits Patent Misuse Doctrine</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Federal-Circuits-En-Banc-Princo-Decision-Limits-Patent-Misuse-Doctrine</link>
      <description>On August 30, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an en-banc decision affirming the International Trade Commission's ("ITC") holding that the "patent misuse" doctrine did not prevent U.S. Philips Corporation ("Philips") from enforcing its patent rights against Princo Corporation and Princo America Corporation (collectively "Princo").  The court's decision, Princo Corp. v. International Trade Comm'n, No. 2007-1386 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 30, 2010) confirms the narrow scope of the patent misuse doctrine, and underscores the broad protection afforded patent holders when licensing their patents.  The case also highlights the challenges that can arise when reconciling intellectual property and antitrust law.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5288c93d-7b3b-4820-bc31-335d4dedfc91</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC and DOJ Issue Final Version of Revised Merger Guidelines</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-and-DOJ-Issue-Final-Version-of-Revised-Merger-Guidelines</link>
      <description>On August 19, 2010, the FTC and DOJ jointly issued the final version of the revised Horizontal Merger Guidelines, marking the end of a revision process initiated in September 2009. Following a series of workshops and dozens of public comments, the agencies issued draft revised guidelines in April 2010, which drew further comments from the public. The latest round of public comments and agency review prompted minor revisions to the April 2010 draft guidelines, noted below.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b1c5fac1-5c8e-4428-a3e0-959c3b97dfb1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Notices Proposed Changes To HSR Form</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Notices-Proposed-Changes-To-HSR-Form</link>
      <description>On August 13, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission issued several proposed changes to the Notification and Report Form companies must complete when notifying transactions subject to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. In addition to simplifying certain hyper-technical reporting requirements, the FTC's proposed revisions would create three new or expanded disclosure obligations. Specifically, the proposed rules would: (1) require all parties to provide additional business documents related to the transaction; (2) expand and modify the parties' revenue reporting obligations; and (3) require disclosure of additional information regarding "associated" entities.
 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2daec3e-42dd-4c4a-88a9-5591e8ecc947</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Settles Charges That Intel Violated Section 5 of the FTC Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Settles-Charges-That-Intel-Violated-Section-5-of-the-FTC-Act</link>
      <description>On August 4, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission approved a proposed consent order with Intel. This settlement resolved FTC allegations that Intel violated Section 5 of the FTC Act when it used de facto exclusive dealing arrangements and market share deals to induce original equipment manufacturers to forgo purchasing non-Intel central processing units ("CPUs") and graphics processing units ("GPUs"). The FTC complaint also alleged that Intel engaged in predatory engineering practices to exclude competitors. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dcd64b28-bdbd-498e-9b90-39a0f99c51a6</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>California Supreme Court Rejects "Pass-on" Defense for Antitrust Damages</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/California-Supreme-Court-Rejects-Pass-on-Defense-for-Antitrust-Damages</link>
      <description>On July 12, 2010, the California Supreme Court resolved an issue of first impression in Clayworth v. Pfizer, finding that the pass-on defense is not available under California law to defendants accused of price-fixing. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that for private antitrust litigation under California’s Cartwright Act, it is no defense that the plaintiff passed on its damages to its customers. The case has far-reaching effects for defendants in defending against antitrust claims brought under California law.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7fa5777-f7ac-4dea-9d44-34bded21dff9</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission publishes draft rules applicable to horizontal co-operation agreements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-publishes-draft-rules-applicable-to-horizontal-co-operation-agreements</link>
      <description>Currently, guidance for horizontal co-operation is provided by two block exemption regulations, Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2659/2000 on research and development (R&amp;D) agreements ("R&amp;D BER"), Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2658/2000 on specialisation agreements ("Specialisation BER"), and the accompanying horizontal guidelines. The block exemption regulations exempt research and development as well as specialisation and joint production agreements from the EU's general ban on restrictive business practices laid down in Article 101 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU"), provided they meet all conditions set out in the regulations. The horizontal guidelines provide an elaborated analytical framework for the assessment of the most common types of horizontal co-operation agreements (including certain concerted practices) and are therefore of the highest practical importance. The European Commission has now opened the discussion on the proposed rules as the current versions of the R&amp;D BER and the Specialisation BER expire at ...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">504b118c-67d9-46bf-9d08-21736d3e2770</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Privilege does not extend to in-house or foreign lawyers in EU antitrust cases says Advocate General of European Court of Justice</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Privilege-does-not-extend-to-in-house-or-foreign-lawyers-in-EU-antitrust-cases-says-Advocate-General-of-European-Court-of-Justice</link>
      <description>On 29 April, the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued an Opinion that legal privilege does not extend to in-house or foreign (e.g., US) lawyers in the context of EU antitrust investigations. The Advocate General also appeared to cast doubt on the scope of privilege for EU-qualified outside counsel. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c1200f6-5d6d-4c6d-aeb7-23a5a314de82</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Second Circuit Wants Full Court Review of Reverse Exclusionary Settlement Payments</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Second-Circuit-Wants-Full-Court-Review-of-Reverse-Exclusionary-Settlement-Payments</link>
      <description>A Second Circuit panel has invited an en banc or full court review of a "reverse exclusionary settlement payments" case that may ultimately reach the Supreme Court. The case is Arkansas Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund v. Bayer A.G., Nos. 05-2851-cv(L) and 05-2852-cv(CON) (2d. Cir. Apr. 29, 2010).  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">484e36f6-b903-4990-b25b-0c54f9f45aca</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>UK Competition Authority in Retreat on Dairy Products "Hub and Spoke" Information Exchange Case  -- Partially abandons case and hands back GB£ 50 million in agreed penalties</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/UK-Competition-Authority-in-Retreat-on-Dairy-Products-Hub-and-Spoke-Information-Exchange-Case-Partially-abandons-case-and-hands-back-GB-50-million-in-agreed-penalties</link>
      <description>Today, 30 April, the UK antitrust regulator, the Office of Fair Trading ('OFT'), announced that it was partially abandoning its case against various supermarkets and dairy firms in relation to the exchange of pricing information. As a result, the OFT will return GB£ 50 million in agreed penalties paid by parties that had reached "early resolution" settlements. The OFT has altogether abandoned its case against Morrisons, one of two supermarkets that did not settle. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c98fae24-c34b-44f7-92b6-a8c41756c72c</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Adopts New Competition Rules For Distribution Of Goods And Services</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-Adopts-New-Competition-Rules-For-Distribution-Of-Goods-And-Services</link>
      <description>On 20 April 2010 the European Commission adopted the new block exemption regulation and guidelines for vertical agreements. The new rules will enter into force on 1 June 2010. A one year transition period applies to existing agreements. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b69f71c-7a0e-498d-8888-d4d6ebfea88c</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC, DOJ Issue Revised Merger Guidelines</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-DOJ-Issue-Revised-Merger-Guidelines</link>
      <description>Today, the FTC and DOJ jointly issued their proposed revision of the Horizontal Merger Guidelines. The Guidelines, which have not been updated in more than a decade, outline how the agencies evaluate the likely competitive impact of proposed mergers and acquisitions and assess whether to challenge individual transactions. This proposed revision is intended to more accurately reflect the agencies' current policies and practices, and further reflects the Obama administration's more aggressive approach to antitrust enforcement.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fc92c1a4-b3ec-4727-90bd-de0e03f7ea9f</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Hedge Funds and Antitrust Compliance:  Antitrust Division Investigates Hedge Funds Shorting Euro</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Hedge-Funds-and-Antitrust-Compliance-Antitrust-Division-Investigates-Hedge-Funds-Shorting-Euro</link>
      <description>When is sharing of investment strategies collusion? This question seems to be at the center of an inquiry by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice in connection with investment strategies shorting the value of the Euro. Recent press reports indicate that the Department of Justice has sent requests to several hedge funds in connection with their trades relating to the Euro.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56d9809f-3a3f-4546-91b7-b7ce0ad45f6a</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>DOJ Sends Strong Civil Enforcement Message with $12 Million Disgorgement Remedy</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/DOJ-Sends-Strong-Civil-Enforcement-Message-with-12-Million-Disgorgement-Remedy</link>
      <description>On February 22, 2010, the Antitrust Division announced a proposed consent decree under which KeySpan Corporation would be required to "disgorge" $12 million in profits realized as a result of an anticompetitive agreement. This marks the first time the DOJ has sought disgorgement in a civil antitrust action under the Sherman Act. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6a691f22-235e-4f3b-924b-614e83c055ac</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Announces New (Lower) HSR and Section 8 Thresholds</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Announces-New-Lower-HSR-and-Section-8-Thresholds</link>
      <description>As if we needed any further evidence of the economic crisis of the past year, for the first time in history the Federal Trade Commission announced today that it would lower the jurisdictional thresholds applicable to both the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act") and Section 8 of the Clayton Act. These dollar thresholds are indexed annually based on changes in the U.S. gross national product. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e48b543-352d-497b-bc49-2c79873724da</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Third Circuit Clarifies Robinson-Patman Act's Competing Purchaser Requirement in Bid Situations</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Third-Circuit-Clarifies-Robinson-Patman-Acts-Competing-Purchaser-Requirement-in-Bid-Situations</link>
      <description>In Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc., Nos. 09-2548, 09-2952, 09-2993 (3d Cir. Jan. 7, 2009), the Third Circuit overturned a district court finding that a manufacturer of food products discriminated in the sale of products to a food service operator customer competing with a distributor. In so doing, the Third Circuit further narrowed the scope of the Robinson-Patman Act in the context of competitive bidding situations. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85445b83-bcc2-4845-b104-bc227ab99fd9</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Commission Consultation on Best Practices</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Commission-Consultation-on-Best-Practices</link>
      <description>On 7 January 2010, the European Commission invited comments on three consultation documents published the same day, namely Best Practices for antitrust proceedings, Best Practices for the submission of economic evidence (both in antitrust and merger proceedings) and Guidance on the role of the Hearing Officers in the context of antitrust proceedings. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca7daa42-daf7-4598-8f09-099e27741eb8</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Trade Commission Charges Intel With Anticompetitive Conduct; Commits to Expedited Administrative Trial and Decision</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Federal-Trade-Commission-Charges-Intel-With-Anticompetitive-Conduct-Commits-to-Expedited-Administrative-Trial-and-Decision</link>
      <description>After years of investigation, the FTC today joined the governmental attack on Intel's market position and behavior in microprocessors. The administrative complaint announced today alleges that Intel engaged in a "course of conduct" designed to preserve its x86 microprocessor monopoly position against technology advances by both AMD and Via Technologies as well as by producers of graphics microprocessors such as Nvidia. The anticompetitive conduct is alleged to include 1) making misleading statements about the market-readiness of Intel's own products, 2) offering coercive bundled pricing and tying of Intel's products resulting in below cost pricing, and 3) specifically designing Intel compiler software to degrade the performance of non-Intel chips running the software.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5dc69312-48c3-4b28-93b5-1036c74c604c</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Berlin Court of Appeals facilitates private actions for antitrust violations – excludes passing on defense for cartel members</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Berlin-Court-of-Appeals-facilitates-private-actions-for-antitrust-violations-excludes-passing-on-defense-for-cartel-members</link>
      <description>On 1 October 2009, the Berlin Court of Appeals issued a judgment that may facilitate considerably damage claims for antitrust violations in Germany. The court excluded the passing on defense, which would otherwise allow a defendant to show that a claimant had passed on all or some of any cartel overcharge to its customers, and, obiter, allowed standing for indirect purchasers. It also provided mechanisms for the estimation of damages. Although the judgment is based on the predecessor of the current German legislation governing antitrust damage claims, it is anticipated that the interpretation of the current law should be no less claimant friendly given that it was introduced to facilitate damage claims. The judgment is final but the issues may be revisited by the Federal Supreme Court in other proceedings. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e5e74140-5ca0-44cf-8537-f923dd5f9a97</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Joaquin Almunia Appointed EC Competition Commissioner</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Joaquin-Almunia-Appointed-EC-Competition-Commissioner</link>
      <description>On November 27, 2009, European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso announced the nomination of Joaquin Almunia to succeed Neelie Kroes as EC Competition Commissioner. The nomination follows requests by Spain 's president Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero that Mr. Barroso gives the Spanish Commissioner Almunia a "key" economic portfolio. Mr. Barroso is said to owe Mr. Zapatero a favor for his support of Mr. Barroso's re-election in the face of opposition by the European Socialist group. Mr. Almunia's nomination, along with the nomination of the rest of the EC Commission, is expected to be confirmed after hearings before the European Parliament in January 2010. If confirmed, the new team of Commissioners will be in office beginning of February 2010.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1cfebe4e-8adb-4785-8d60-e91a10163b20</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Closes Qualcomm Investigation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-Closes-Qualcomm-Investigation</link>
      <description>Today, the European Commission announced that it closed its investigation into Qualcomm’s licensing practices of 3G mobile technology patents.  In October 2007, the Commission initiated formal proceedings against Qualcomm Inc., a US chipset manufacturer and holder of IP rights in the CDMA and WCDMA standards for mobile telephony, regarding an alleged infringement of Article 82 EC (which forbids abuse of dominant position).  The Commission initiated this investigation following complaints by mobile phone and chipset manufacturers Nokia, Ericsson, Broadcom, Texas Instruments, Panasonic and NEC.  The WCDMA standard forms part of the 3G (third generation) standard for European mobile phone technology (also referred to as “UMTS”). The complaints alleged that Qualcomm’s licensing practices breached Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (“FRAND”) standards and therefore breached EC competition rules.  The complaints also alleged that charging non-FRAND royalties would lead to higher handset prices, a slower development of the 3G standard, and ...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85dec0aa-2281-487e-a17d-b2e137f8c6c0</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>ECJ confirms that GSK distribution arrangements must be reassessed by Commission, but overturns CFI on purpose of EU competition rules</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/ECJ-confirms-that-GSK-distribution-arrangements-must-be-reassessed-by-Commission-but-overturns-CFI-on-purpose-of-EU-competition-rules</link>
      <description>On 6 October 2009 the European Court of Justice ('ECJ') confirmed the judgment of the European Court of First Instance ('CFI') that the Commission must reassess the impact of GSK's distribution arrangements in Spain, but overturned the CFI's finding that the fundamental purpose of EU competition rules is the protection of final consumers. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e290f8b-b15a-427d-b136-5c2f0297b161</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Publishes Final Report in Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry and Opens Formal Proceedings against Patent Settlements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-Publishes-Final-Report-in-Pharmaceutical-Sector-Inquiry-and-Opens-Formal-Proceedings-against-Patent-Settlements</link>
      <description>The European Commission today published the final report in its Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry. The Commission's findings remain largely unchanged from those in the interim report published in November last year. However, the language of the final report is less overtly critical of originator companies and the Commission's focus appears to have shifted away from the pursuit of individual antitrust cases and towards changes to the regulatory framework governing pharmaceutical markets. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1bd30632-2bb0-4eef-8ded-6389649d78d1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission imposes Euro 20 million fine for early implementation of a merger ('Gun-jumping')</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-imposes-Euro-20-million-fine-for-early-implementation-of-a-merger-Gun-jumping</link>
      <description>On 10 June, the European Commission imposed a Euro 20 million fine on the Belgian electricity producer Electrabel for implementing a notifiable merger without having received prior approval under the EC Merger Regulation ('ECMR'). </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2d99b262-6ce2-42b8-a58a-ef89906769ff</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Belgian Competition Council shows its teeth and levies a 66,3 million Euro fine</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Belgian-Competition-Council-shows-its-teeth-and-levies-a-66-3-million-Euro-fine</link>
      <description>On May 26, 2009, the Belgian competition Council fined Proximus, the incumbent Belgian wireless communications provider, a record 66,3 million Euro for abuse of dominance.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e29148b-5979-404b-9cda-1cdae6ef002d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission imposes record € 1.06 billion antitrust fine on Intel</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-imposes-record-106-billion-antitrust-fine-on-Intel</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">64ed4015-7b3d-40c8-9df1-c6f1330053d2</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Second domestic sales threshold for German merger control in force today</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Second-domestic-sales-threshold-for-German-merger-control-in-force-today</link>
      <description>Today, 25 March 2009, an amendment to the German Act against Restraints of Competition entered into force (the day after its publication in Germany’s Official Journal). The amendment introduces a second domestic sales threshold for German merger control. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a341af4f-5855-4009-9059-2cdd9d2a3954</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC, Whole Foods Reach Agreement on Wild Oats Acquisition</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Whole-Foods-Reach-Agreement-on-Wild-Oats-Acquisition</link>
      <description>The FTC has settled one of the most contentious merger challenges in recent history by reaching an agreement with Whole Foods Market Inc., allowing it to partially "unscramble the eggs" of Whole Foods's consummated merger with Wild Oats. Under that agreement, Whole Foods will divest 31 former Wild Oats locations (and one Whole Foods location), along with the Wild Oats brand and associated intellectual property. The settlement signals the FTC's willingness to compromise and seek a practical resolution, despite recent litigation momentum favoring the FTC. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aea4bbd4-2cd4-4106-97a2-1f87618f275d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New FTC Settlement with Music Industry Trade Association Provides Important Guidance For Associations That Conduct Industry-Wide Meetings</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/New-FTC-Settlement-with-Music-Industry-Trade-Association-Provides-Important-Guidance-For-Associations-That-Conduct-Industry-Wide-Meetings</link>
      <description>On March 4, 2009, the Federal Trade Commission issued a consent order to settle charges that the National Association of Music Merchants (NAMM) violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by facilitating manufacturers' discussions of minimum advertised pricing (MAP) policies and related strategies. The FTC focused almost entirely on the association's role in "selecting moderators and setting the agenda" for association meetings that addressed the topic of minimum resale price maintenance in the musical instrument industry. The FTC's focus on the role of the association, and the remedies sought by the FTC, provide important new guidance for associations and requirements for association antitrust compliance programs. Associations that hold industry-wide meetings should review their antitrust compliance policies and update them in light of this order. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8c219abe-ac61-4378-a4cf-76de38479d16</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Germany introduces second domestic turnover threshold for merger control</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Germany-introduces-second-domestic-turnover-threshold-for-merger-control</link>
      <description>On 13 February 2009, the German legislator approved an amendment to the Act against Restraints of Competition ("ARC") that will significantly reduce the need for merger control filings and observation of the statutory waiting period for transactions with focus outside Germany.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">062ac999-ff9d-4583-809b-80527f5a8dcc</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>German competition authority imposes high fine for 'gun-jumping'</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/German-competition-authority-imposes-high-fine-for-gun-jumping</link>
      <description>Today the Bundeskartellamt ("FCO") has fined a US-based company EUR 4.5 million for 'gun-jumping' in Germany. This is the highest fine ever imposed by the FCO for implementing a transaction before clearance and as such appears to be in line with the tougher stance competition authorities in Europe are prepared to take for infringements of procedural law. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7d9ccb90-e1b8-4157-b832-964376b58e88</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>EU Antitrust: European Commission issues its guidance paper on the application of Art. 82 EC Treaty to exclusionary abuses</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/EU-Antitrust-European-Commission-issues-its-guidance-paper-on-the-application-of-Art-82-EC-Treaty-to-exclusionary-abuses</link>
      <description>On Wednesday 3 December 2008, the European Commission issued the long awaited guidance paper on abuse of a dominant market position in exclusionary cases. The paper provides guidance on the economic and effect-based approach the Commission intends to use when assessing abuse of dominance cases.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c93e45b-6116-4135-a6d8-6377f03087d8</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>EU Antitrust: Raids on Pharma Companies and E.ON Divestments </title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/EU-Antitrust-Raids-on-Pharma-Companies-and-EON-Divestments</link>
      <description>The European Commission has confirmed that it conducted antitrust dawn raids at the offices of several pharmaceutical companies in Europe on November 24. The raids come four days before publication of the interim report in the Commission’s pharmaceuticals sector inquiry investigating competition issues in the industry. Press reports have identified both generic and originator companies as targets of the raids.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">375daf60-206c-4576-9aab-ebdaca6b86dc</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission revises Remedies Notice and amends Merger Implementing Regulation</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-revises-Remedies-Notice-and-amends-Merger-Implementing-Regulation</link>
      <description>On 22 October the European Commission has published the long awaited revised notice on remedies acceptable under the EC Merger Regulation ("Revised Notice") as well as corresponding amendments of the merger implementing regulation. The Revised Notice comes after a series of decisions by the European courts and an extensive study on the effective design and implementation of merger remedies in Commission cases ("Remedies Study"). It further follows a public consultation that was held on the basis of a draft notice in 2007. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e6845b2b-644e-4e15-b054-3bfd22fff45b</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>ECJ Allows Dominant Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Refusal To Supply In Order To Defend Legitimate Commercial Interests</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/ECJ-Allows-Dominant-Pharmaceutical-Manufacturers-Refusal-To-Supply-In-Order-To-Defend-Legitimate-Commercial-Interests</link>
      <description>While in 2005 the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") (Case C-53/03 - Syfait and others v. GlaxoSmithKline) refused to rule on the application of Art. 82 EC to supply quota systems because the referring Greek competition authority was not found to be a court within the meaning of Art. 234 EC, the ECJ held today (Joined Cases C-468/06 to C-478/06 - Sot. Lelos and others v. GlaxoSmithKline) that a pharmaceutical company would not abuse its dominant position, if "the refusal […] to supply wholesalers involved in parallel exports constitutes a reasonable and proportionate measure in relation to the threat that those exports represent to its legitimate commercial interests […]" (para. 70). Should a dominant pharmaceutical company, however, refuse to meet "ordinary" orders from a wholesaler, it is abusing its dominant position (para. 77).  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">28f4ab9f-9ebe-4e00-8d5d-e35e23a19ab3</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>High Noon: DOJ and FTC Shootout Over Report on Single Firm Conduct</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/High-Noon-DOJ-and-FTC-Shootout-Over-Report-on-Single-Firm-Conduct</link>
      <description>In the waning days of the Bush Administration, as many are focused on what the future may hold for antitrust enforcement, the normally cordial relations between the FTC and the Justice Department erupted into a full fledged fight over the future of Section 2 enforcement. The FTC and DOJ today released statements revealing not only significant differences between the way the two agencies currently view unilateral, potentially monopolistic conduct, but quite possibly a glimpse of what is to come in the next administration regardless of who wins the presidency. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da6f48de-2f4b-4b03-b862-640a380f1b76</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Wins Reversal in Whole Foods</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Wins-Reversal-in-Whole-Foods</link>
      <description>What a difference a year makes. After losing all of its litigated merger challenges in 2007 (Peoples Natural Gas; Western Refining; Whole Foods), 2008 has yielded significant wins for the FTC. Through a decidedly more strategic procedural attack on proposed transactions, the Commission trumped two highly publicized deals. Earlier this year, the FTC launched a double-pronged approach against the Inova hospital merger, moving ahead with administrative proceedings while a preliminary injunction ("PI") was pending in federal court. (The parties ended up abandoning the deal without even waiting for the PI hearing to be held.) Now, months after Whole Foods and Wild Oats consummated their merger, the D.C. Circuit resuscitated the FTC's argument that injunctive relief is appropriate to stop a deal.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b4164128-0566-4d43-a969-101af0305950</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The FTC Examines Green Claims for Textiles and Buildings</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/The-FTC-Examines-Green-Claims-for-Textiles-and-Buildings</link>
      <description>On July 15, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") held the third installment of its "Eco in the Market" workshop series designed to help the FTC review and revise its Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims ("Green Guides" or "Guides"). The Green Guides were originally promulgated in 1992 and revised in 1998 to help producers promote the green qualities of their products without misleading consumers and running afoul of Section 5 of the FTC Act. Since 1998, consumer interest in sustainability, global warming, and the environment has exploded and industry is developing innovative "green" initiatives, prompting the FTC to revisit the Guides. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bf704a70-bff8-4937-bb20-97d0c1cd1592</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Court Issues Landmark Judgment on Mergers in Concentrated Markets</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Court-Issues-Landmark-Judgment-on-Mergers-in-Concentrated-Markets</link>
      <description>Two years ago, the EU Court of First Instance (CFI) stunned commentators, the parties and the European Commission by overturning the Commission's decision to clear a joint venture combining the recorded music businesses of Sony and Bertelsmann (BMG). In doing so, the CFI reduced the level of evidence needed to block a merger on coordinated effects grounds – i.e. in concentrated markets where there is no single dominant player post-merger – threatening to significantly increase the number of mergers blocked under EU law. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d853453e-2b50-404d-a2fe-9022ab06a42a</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Consultancy Firms Contributing to Implementation of Cartel Subject to Fines</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Consultancy-Firms-Contributing-to-Implementation-of-Cartel-Subject-to-Fines</link>
      <description>In its landmark judgment of 8 July 2008, the Court of First Instance (CFI) confirmed a Commission decision finding that a consultancy firm which has contributed to the implementation of a cartel, even without being active on the relevant market, may be fined for complicity under Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty. In its decision of 10 December 2003, the Commission found that Atofina, Peroxid Chemie, Laporte and Perorsa, European producers of organic peroxides, had infringed the competition rules by fixing prices, agreeing on and implementing a mechanism for price increases, allocating customers and setting up a system to monitor and enforce their agreements. For these reasons, the Commission imposed on the companies fines of nearly € 70 million.
 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">976aec38-eac7-4000-bae8-a05a1e6c2be7</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Introduces New Settlement Procedure for Cartel Cases</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-Introduces-New-Settlement-Procedure-for-Cartel-Cases</link>
      <description>The European Commission today introduced a new settlement procedure for cartel cases, under which the parties that acknowledge their participation in a cartel may obtain a 10% reduction in fines. This procedure is intended to simplify the Commission’s administrative processes, freeing up resources so that it can pursue new cases. It may also reduce the number of appeals to the European Courts in cartel cases. Parties do not automatically have a right to settlement under the new process, and the Commission will have full discretion to determine whether a case is suitable for settlement. Nor will the Commission negotiate the use of evidence or the appropriate sanction. The Commission will inform the parties of its case and the supporting evidence. Parties will then have to indicate whether they wish to pursue a settlement. In order to settle, parties will have to acknowledge the scope and duration of the cartel as ...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18d2ec6f-e95b-4af3-93e6-34c57393ddbd</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC's Bureau of Competition Issues Report and Statement Emphasizing Continued Scrutiny of Pharmaceutical Agreements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTCs-Bureau-of-Competition-Issues-Report-and-Statement-Emphasizing-Continued-Scrutiny-of-Pharmaceutical-Agreements</link>
      <description>On May 21, 2008, underscoring its close scrutiny of settlements and other agreements concerning generic drugs, the Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") released its Summary of Agreements Filed in FY 2007, A Report by the Bureau of Competition for agreements filed under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 ("MMA"). Simultaneously, the FTC released a statement reflecting the FTC's intent to continue to scrutinize these agreements and take action when these arrangements risk harm to consumers. Commissioner Jon Leibowitz commented that "pay-for-delay settlements continue to proliferate," and FTC Chairman William E. Kovacic said that the report "confirms that settlements with potentially anticompetitive arrangements continue to be prevalent." Chairman Kovacic also stated that the FTC "remains committed to ensuring that brand and generic companies do not use such settlements as a way to deny consumers the benefits of competition." </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8bfcd0fc-9382-4ee1-85ca-973a3e1c6be2</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Nine West Steps into Leegin's Shoes: FTC Modifies 2000 Consent Order</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Nine-West-Steps-into-Leegins-Shoes-FTC-Modifies-2000-Consent-Order</link>
      <description>Shoe seller Nine West Group Inc. has successfully petitioned the FTC to modify a 2000 consent order in which the company agreed not to undertake agreements with its retailers setting minimum resale prices. The case provides a significant guidepost for U.S. manufacturers who have been searching for direction on what resale price maintenance ("RPM") practices might be considered acceptable since the Supreme Court abandoned its strict prohibition of minimum RPM agreements in 2007's Leegin Creative Leather Products vs. PSKS Inc. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19e6ac15-fab0-4969-81cf-f935c9c97ab5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Antitrust/IP Interface: D.C. Circuit Reverses FTC in Rambus Case Involving Alleged Deception of Standards Development Organization</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Antitrust-IP-Interface-DC-Circuit-Reverses-FTC-in-Rambus-Case-Involving-Alleged-Deception-of-Standards-Development-Organization</link>
      <description>In a landmark decision this week, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit unanimously reversed the Federal Trade Commission's decision that Rambus violated the antitrust laws for alleged deception of a standards development organization. While not addressing whether Rambus' conduct might still have violated Section 5 of the FTC Act independent of a violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, the court expressed "grave doubts" about any liability being found on remand. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">991bf19f-48f9-41fb-b12f-0b1e8c6764e2</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Release of European Commission’s White Paper on Damages Actions for Breach of EC Antitrust Rules</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Release-of-European-Commission-s-White-Paper-on-Damages-Actions-for-Breach-of-EC-Antitrust-Rules</link>
      <description>Today, the European Commission (“Commission”) released a White Paper on Damages Actions for Breach of EC Antitrust Rules together with a Commission Staff Working Paper and Impact Assessment Report. The White Paper is another step along the path toward legislative measures aiming to facilitate private enforcement of EU competition law. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ae3c35c-2fd4-4cb0-b8a3-4b6b96c54b96</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>United's Acquisition of Sierra Proceeds with Settlement of Medicare Advantage Antitrust Allegations</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Uniteds-Acquisition-of-Sierra-Proceeds-with-Settlement-of-Medicare-Advantage-Antitrust-Allegations</link>
      <description>The United States Department of Justice (the “Department”) and the Nevada Attorney General settled allegations on February 25, 2008 that UnitedHealth Group’s ("United") acquisition of Sierra Health Services ("Sierra") would harm competition in the sale of Medicare Advantage (“MA”) plans in the Las Vegas area. The acquisition closed later that same day. Crowell &amp; Moring represented Sierra in the transaction. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3fa34877-ec01-4724-a291-a867b3cbb1bf</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Record Fine (EUR 899 million) Imposed on Microsoft Today</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Record-Fine-EUR-899-million-Imposed-on-Microsoft-Today</link>
      <description>Today, the European Commission (“Commission”) has imposed a fine of EUR 899 million on Microsoft for its non-compliance with the Commission’s Decision of March 2004. This is the second time the Commission has fined Microsoft for non-compliance with its March 2004 decision and the highest fine ever imposed on a single company by the Commission for the violation of competition law. Together with the first penalty decision for non-compliance (EUR 280.5 Million) and the original fine of EUR 497 million for violations of competition law Microsoft has to pay fines of more than EUR 1.6 billion in total. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fea132f0-5870-4dd9-bd22-11cbdc555bf9</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Crowell &amp; Moring Obtains Victory In First Tried Indirect Purchaser Pharmaceutical Antitrust Case</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Crowell-Moring-Obtains-Victory-In-First-Tried-Indirect-Purchaser-Pharmaceutical-Antitrust-Case</link>
      <description>Crowell &amp; Moring lawyers, led by Robert T. Rhoad, obtained a significant victory on behalf of Health Care Service Corporation ("HCSC") in the first and only indirect purchaser antitrust case to date tried to verdict involving the pharmaceutical industry. On Thursday, January 24, 2008, Chief Judge Thomas F. Hogan of the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia granted HCSC's motion to treble the damages awarded by the jury to HCSC in the In re Lorazepam &amp; Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation (D.D.C.). Initially, HCSC was included within a class of indirect purchasers/third-party payors in the underlying class actions. Although the class litigation was settled, HCSC, along with three other third-party payors (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota and Federated Mutual Insurance Co.), elected to opt-out of the class settlement and litigate their antitrust claims on their own.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6c7587b9-e797-454f-b3d5-9f66dfae04e7</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Key HSR Filing Threshold Will Increase To $63.1 Million As Of Feb. 28</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Key-HSR-Filing-Threshold-Will-Increase-To-631-Million-As-Of-Feb-28</link>
      <description>The Federal Trade Commission recently revised the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”). The dollar thresholds of the HSR Act and Rules are indexed on an annual basis, based on changes in the U.S. gross national product. As a result of the recent changes, the size-of-transaction threshold will increase from $59.8 million to $63.1 million. In addition, the size-of-party thresholds, the filing fee thresholds and the thresholds applicable to certain exemptions to the HSR Act will also increase. These revisions will become effective on February 28, 2008. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1f48a67d-11d5-4a4b-89d1-6a4c2455c25a</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Imposes € 38 Million Fine On E.ON For Breach Of A Seal During An Inspection</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-Imposes-38-Million-Fine-On-EON-For-Breach-Of-A-Seal-During-An-Inspection</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">725f63b6-e0b5-4aaa-a5e9-8ddf0b00ee30</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission launches dawn raids against pharmaceutical companies despite having no ‘specific evidence of wrongdoing’</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-launches-dawn-raids-against-pharmaceutical-companies-despite-having-no-specific-evidence-of-wrongdoing</link>
      <description>Yesterday, the European Commission launched an inquiry into the pharmaceuticals sector by carrying out dawn raids on several of the world’s largest pharmaceuticals companies – including GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis and Pfizer. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9914f5df-e777-42e5-b303-3e44d3129586</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Commission Toughens Stance on Early Implementation of Mergers and Acquisitions (‘Gun –Jumping’) </title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Commission-Toughens-Stance-on-Early-Implementation-of-Mergers-and-Acquisitions-Gun-Jumping</link>
      <description>On 12 and 13 December, the European Commission carried out ‘dawn raids’ on two PVC manufacturers in the UK. The companies are suspected of implementing a notifiable merger without first obtaining the mandatory regulatory clearance from the Commission – so-called ‘gun jumping’ – in breach of Article 7(1) of the EC Merger Regulations. The Commission’s concerns appear to include the exchange of sensitive information between the companies. If the companies are found guilty of gun-jumping, the Commission has powers to impose fines of up to 10% of their total worldwide group turnover.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f81b67d3-7443-47c4-9cfa-9ab5b6a11b68</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>German Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court) Provides Guidance on the Definition of the De Minimis Clause in Determining Whether a Merger Is Subject to German Merger Control</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/German-Bundesgerichtshof-Federal-Supreme-Court-Provides-Guidance-on-the-Definition-of-the-De-Minimis-Clause-in-Determining-Whether-a-Merger-Is-Subject-to-German-Merger-Control</link>
      <description>Last Friday, in a controversial and long-awaited decision, the German Bundesgerichtshof clarified the de minimis merger filing exception in Germany. In Germany, merger filings are required if the thresholds are met and the concentration has an impact on the market unless the market affected by the merger is a de minimis market. What constitutes a de minimis market has been the subject of considerable debate. In its judgment the Bundesgerichtshof clarifies the so-called “minor market clause” (section 35 (2), no. 2 Act against Restraints of Competition (“ARC”)).  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1983b733-943f-447d-895c-c5144c0ec8dc</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The Fourth Circuit Derails Class Action by Sending Conspiracy Claims to Individual Arbitrations</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/The-Fourth-Circuit-Derails-Class-Action-by-Sending-Conspiracy-Claims-to-Individual-Arbitrations</link>
      <description>On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that class representatives in a price-fixing case against manufacturers of cotton yarn must arbitrate their claims. In re: Cotton Yarn Antitrust Litigation, No. 05-2392, 2007 WL 2965586 (4th Cir. Oct. 12, 2007). In an opinion that reflects the strong national policy favoring arbitration, the Fourth Circuit rejected plaintiffs’ contentions that the manufacturers’ arbitration provisions, which include non-joinder clauses and a one-year limitations period, unduly frustrate plaintiffs’ rights under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ff9877d-6829-422a-aff9-b5812a5b93d7</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>EU Ruling Deals Blow to Microsoft</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/EU-Ruling-Deals-Blow-to-Microsoft</link>
      <description>In a long-awaited decision issued early this morning, the European Union’s Court of First Instance (CFI) rejected Microsoft’s appeal and upheld one of the most controversial decisions of the European Commission to date. The CFI, the second highest European court, affirmed the Commission’s substantive findings against Microsoft and upheld steep fines against the software supplier.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">90d4960f-b07d-4b8d-8765-829e1655af4e</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Practical Considerations Arising From Supreme Court's Leegin Decision Overturning Per Se Treatment of Minimum Resale Price Maintenance Agreements</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Practical-Considerations-Arising-From-Supreme-Courts-Leegin-Decision-Overturning-Per-Se-Treatment-of-Minimum-Resale-Price-Maintenance-Agreements</link>
      <description>Today, the Supreme Court overturned nearly a hundred years of antitrust precedent in a groundbreaking 5-4 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. The decision overturned Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park &amp; Sons, 220 U.S. 373 (1911), which made it per se illegal for a manufacturer and its distributor to agree on a minimum price at which the distributor may resell the manufacturer’s goods. Dr. Miles’s demise completes a long series of Court decisions loosening restrictions on manufacturers’ ability to structure and discipline their distribution networks as they see fit, including 1977’s Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. 36, and 1997’s State Oil v. Khan, 522 U.S. 3 (abolishing the treatment of nonprice vertical restraints and maximum RPM agreements, respectively, as per se illegal).  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9d4a5ed-06c1-41c1-beb9-a0a0aa7abc0d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court Decision Raises Standard for Pleading Conspiracy Cases Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Supreme-Court-Decision-Raises-Standard-for-Pleading-Conspiracy-Cases-Under-Section-1-of-the-Sherman-Act</link>
      <description>Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down a key antitrust decision that will make it more difficult to bring conspiracy cases under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. In its much anticipated opinion in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, the Court adopted a pleading standard that considerably raises the bar for plaintiffs in antitrust (and possibly other) cases. The ruling will make many more antitrust complaints subject to dismissal at the pre-discovery stage. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">617e794c-c095-4afc-8f8f-5f58cca518ff</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The DOJ And FTC Issue Their Second Report On The Interface Of IP And Antitrust Law</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/The-DOJ-And-FTC-Issue-Their-Second-Report-On-The-Interface-Of-IP-And-Antitrust-Law</link>
      <description>Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued their long-awaited second report on the interface between Antitrust and Intellectual Property laws. In 2002, the agencies held hearings on this issue, receiving testimony from more than 300 panelists and more than 100 written comments.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">59475c7c-e5b9-428f-8e7b-c196fa3abe33</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Senators Grill Antitrust Officials over Lax Merger Enforcement</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Senators-Grill-Antitrust-Officials-over-Lax-Merger-Enforcement</link>
      <description>The newly formed Senate Subcomittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights of the Senate Judiciary Committee cross-examined Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Thomas O. Barnett, and FTC Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras on the perceived leniency of their respective merger enforcement practices. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c292b0fe-04e8-409e-82aa-25c412f091e9</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court Brings Law on Predatory Buying into Line with Existing Rule on Predatory Selling</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Supreme-Court-Brings-Law-on-Predatory-Buying-into-Line-with-Existing-Rule-on-Predatory-Selling</link>
      <description>On Tuesday February 20th, the Supreme Court delivered a unanimous decision making it more difficult for businesses to run afoul of the antitrust law for buying inputs at high prices. In the case, Weyerhaueuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., the Court overturned a jury verdict awarding damages to the now-shuttered Ross-Simmons lumber company. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec5b66f3-ef57-48d0-9a4c-ff5ec9a5784a</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Draft EC Notice On Non-Horizontal Mergers</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Draft-EC-Notice-On-Non-Horizontal-Mergers</link>
      <description>On 13 February 2007, the European Commission published its eagerly awaited draft guidelines to govern non-horizontal mergers falling within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">263ae94d-7869-4a7e-af1d-8bbb3222cba7</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Compulsory Licensing As An Antitrust Remedy</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Compulsory-Licensing-As-An-Antitrust-Remedy</link>
      <description>The Federal Trade Commission has issued its final order in the remedy phase of its proceedings against Rambus, Inc. The Commission previously ruled that Rambus' false statements about its patent portfolio to a standard-setting organization enabled it to monopolize the markets for four technologies incorporated into standards set by the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (“JDEC”).  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">05b0c453-907b-4333-aee9-91df051d120f</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>European Antitrust Alert</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/European-Antitrust-Alert</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fbd8caa3-c024-4f72-9a2c-c878a6c0c9fa</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Issues New HSR Thresholds</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Issues-New-HSR-Thresholds</link>
      <description>Today the Federal Trade Commission released its annual revisions to the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds applicable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”).  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41841d80-c67c-448a-ae73-b0e5735af318</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Opening up Energy Markets in Europe</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/Opening-up-Energy-Markets-in-Europe</link>
      <description>When Neelie Kroes (European Commissioner for Competition) took office in 2004, she announced that competition enforcement in the energy sector would be one of the key priorities for the new European Commission. Accordingly, in June 2005 she took the rather unusual step of initiating a formal Sector Inquiry into the European energy markets. The initial results were published in November 2005 and a preliminary report in February 2006 which was then subject to public consultation. Today the European Commission has published the final report.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0a186e70-26ab-4890-afa3-d2020b6a9d3c</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>FTC Reaches Settlement With Major Weight-Control Pill Marketers</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/Antitrust-Law-Alert/FTC-Reaches-Settlement-With-Major-Weight-Control-Pill-Marketers</link>
      <description>The FTC announced yesterday that it has reached a $25 Million settlement agreement with the marketers of weight-control pills Xenadrine EFX, CortiSlim and CortiStress, TrimSpa, and One-A-Day WeightSmart. The settlements were the result of complaints the agency filed against each party, alleging deceptive marketing in connection with unsubstantiated advertised claims regarding the efficacy of the products. </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>